REPUBLICANS have vowed to intensify their campaign against the monarchy in the run up to the coronation of Charles III and on the day itself.
Protest group Republic has temporarily suspended activities as a mark of respect following the Queen’s death but has pledged that the campaign will continue.
In a letter to supporters, chief executive Graham Smith (pictured) said: “I’m conscious that we must continue to represent your views and speak for the large number of people in the UK who want there to be a democratic succession to an elected head of state.
“Today we need to avoid causing unnecessary offence and prepare ourselves for the debate to come. King Charles is already on the throne, and that’s where the debate must begin.
READ MORE: King Charles’ first visit to Scottish Parliament as King announced
“We will be campaigning all through the run up to and on the day of the coronation, which we assume will be in the spring.”
Smith has previously said the Queen’s death would put the future of the institution in “serious jeopardy”.
“Charles may inherit the throne, but he won’t inherit the deference and respect afforded the queen,” he said.
There is no written constitution that lays out the steps needed to abolish the monarchy but republicans argue that if public opinion is against it, then it cannot continue.
A previous significant interruption to the royal line was when Charles I was executed after being convicted of high treason.
Republic claims the Royal family costs Scottish taxpayers upwards of £35 million a year but gets little financial benefit.
The latest official figures put the sovereign grant that funds the royals at £51.5m in 2020-21, with an additional grant of £34.4m to pay for the refurbishment of Buckingham Palace. Separately, the Queen received surplus money from the Duchy of Lancaster Estate which was £22.3m in 2020-21.
However, Republic’s own research puts the total cost of the royals to the British public as at least £345m, with £35m contributed from Scotland.
The group says the higher figure is due to hidden costs such as security, the costs to councils of royal visits, lost income and lost opportunities to raise revenue.
Defenders of the royals claim they bring in money to the economy as a tourist attraction but Graham Smith of Republic said there was “no evidence” of that.
“Certainly they don’t in Scotland,” he said. “No one goes to Scotland in the expectation of seeing the royals.”
The Queen’s death is also expected to trigger a rise in republicanism in some of the 14 other realms that now have Charles III as head of state.
Jamaica and Belize have signalled they want to follow Barbados in ditching the monarchy and recent polls in Australia have been in favour of an Australian head of state following the death of the Queen.
While sending condolences on the Queen’s death, the Australian Republican Movement also noted she had “respected the self-determination of the Australian people”.
“The Queen backed the right of Australians to become a fully independent nation during the referendum on an Australian republic in 1999, saying that she has ‘always made it clear that the future of the monarchy in Australia is an issue for the Australian people and them alone to decide’,” it said.
In New Zealand, polls show younger people are growing in favour of a republic and Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has said she expects the country to become one during her lifetime, although it is not an issue that is a priority for her government.
Canadian polls indicate around half the population is in favour of cutting its ties to the monarchy following the death of the Queen.
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community – a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Last Updated:
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?
This website and associated newspapers adhere to the Independent Press Standards Organisation’s Editors’ Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about the editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then please contact the editor here. If you are dissatisfied with the response provided you can contact IPSO here
© 2001-2022. This site is part of Newsquest’s audited local newspaper network. A Gannett Company. Newsquest Media Group Ltd, Loudwater Mill, Station Road, High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire. HP10 9TY. Registered in England & Wales | 01676637 |
Data returned from the Piano ‘meterActive/meterExpired’ callback event.
As a subscriber, you are shown 80% less display advertising when reading our articles.
Those ads you do see are predominantly from local businesses promoting local services.
These adverts enable local businesses to get in front of their target audience – the local community.
It is important that we continue to promote these adverts as our local businesses need as much support as possible during these challenging times.