The IMF Press Center is a password-protected site for working journalists.
The IMF Press Center is a password-protected site for working journalists.
PRESS CENTER
 Sign up to receive free e-mail notices when new series and/or country items are posted on the IMF website. 
 Modify your profile
October 7, 2022
A Concluding Statement describes the preliminary findings of IMF staff at the end of an official staff visit (or ‘mission’), in most cases to a member country. Missions are undertaken as part of regular (usually annual) consultations under Article IV of the IMF’s Articles of Agreement, in the context of a request to use IMF resources (borrow from the IMF), as part of discussions of staff monitored programs, or as part of other staff monitoring of economic developments. 
     Washington, DC     : 
              Mexico faces a challenging environment as global inflation has surged.          Even though the post-pandemic recovery has been relatively gradual,     domestic inflation has accelerated to levels not observed in two decades.     Near-term growth prospects for the United States have weakened, as real     incomes are eroded by inflation and both fiscal and monetary policy are     tightening. In general, global financial conditions have tightened as     central banks have responded to high inflation, increasing the risks of     capital flow reversals in emerging market economies. 
     Mexico is well placed               to navigate this potentially turbulent environment, given prudence in         macroeconomic policy and solid fiscal and monetary policy frameworks          . Nevertheless, scarring from the pandemic and the more difficult global     environment could compound the long-standing problems of low growth and     high inequality. As a result, despite strong outturns in the first half of     2022, growth is projected to decline in the next few quarters. Inflation is     expected to plateau in the second half of 2022 and then decline gradually,     as higher raw food prices and other cost-push factors continue to feed into     prices. The balance of risks to the growth outlook is tilted to the     downside while inflation risks are skewed to the upside. More persistent     global or domestic inflation, another spike in international oil or food     prices, a greater-than-expected tightening of global financial conditions,     or a sharper slowdown in U.S. growth are the main downsides that Mexico may     need to contend with. On the upside, an acceleration in nearshoring of     economic activity for better access to the North American market could     moderate the impact of lower U.S. growth.  
     Tackling High Inflation  
              Banco de México (Banxico) has taken a proactive approach to addressing         increasingly broad-based inflation.          Successive and gradually larger increases in the reference rate have     brought the ex ante real policy rate (i.e., the nominal rate adjusted for     one-year ahead inflation expectations) to restrictive levels. This has been     an appropriately calibrated response to the upward surprises to inflation.     Banxico has also rightly indicated its intention to further increase the     policy rate. 
              Returning to low and stable inflation will likely require some further         increases in the policy rate by the end of the year and maintaining it         there for some time.          The proactive policy tightening already put in place, alongside some     further hikes broadly consistent with market expectations as well as     incoming data, should lead to a decline in inflation. However, there is     significant uncertainty about the timing, speed, and durability of the     downward path for inflation in 2023. Further, there are important upsides     to inflation from commodity prices, supply chain constraints, local food     prices, a feed through to prices from the increase in the minimum wage,     inertia in wage and price formation, and increases in near-term inflation     expectations. As such, a         risk management approach would argue for policy rates to be clearly         restrictive for some time to mitigate these upside risks          and firm up near-term inflation expectations around Banxico’s 3 percent     target. 
              Particularly in the current environment of uncertainty, clear monetary         policy communication will increase policy effectiveness.          Banxico has begun publishing inflation forecasts and an indication of the     likely direction of future rate changes with each monetary policy decision.     These efforts will help the public better understand how the Governing     Board sees the current economic environment and the policy decisions they     have taken. To further strengthen this understanding, Banxico could start     publishing information on the policy rate path that underpins its macro     forecast, including the expected terminal rate in the tightening cycle and     its duration. This path should be viewed as guidance and not a policy     commitment. However, even as this expected path changes over time it would     provide valuable information on the central bank’s policy reaction     function. A broader review of the experience with Banxico’s inflation     targeting framework in due time could also provide useful suggestions for     further improvements to the policy framework and the communications     toolkit, building on recent improvements. 
              Continued large minimum wage increases could create upside risks to         inflation.          Minimum wages are now close to the formal sector median wage, which creates     risks of adverse employment effects and an increase in informality. The     large minimum wage increases envisaged for the next two years could further     add to inflationary pressures at a time when it is critical to return to     low and stable levels of inflation. 
              Many of the fiscal measures put in place to mitigate the impact of the         rising cost of living have been untargeted.          Retail fuel price stabilization has reduced cost pressures for the economy,     likely lowering inflation by close to 2 percentage points around the recent     peak of global oil prices peaked. However, this has come at a sizeable     budgetary cost (estimated at 1.4 percent of GDP in 2022) and has also     benefited higher income households. Furthermore, by diluting price signals,     the policy has short-circuited the needed adjustment in fuel demand. The     budgetary cost of measures to mitigate the impact of higher food prices     have been smaller, although they have sought to address multiple objectives     and their overall economic impact is difficult to assess. In addition, the     large increases in social (noncontributory) pensions in the past few years     have also contributed to cushion the rising cost of living. 
              However, these fiscal measures and the increases in the minimum         wage—alongside the post-pandemic rebound in the broader economy—have         helped support real incomes.          CONEVAL data suggests that real per capita labor income increased by 4     percent as of mid-2022, while labor income poverty decreased further (to     around 40 percent of the population from a peak of 46 percent in late     2020). Primarily, these achievements reflect the economic recovery,     improving labor market conditions, and a continued high level of remittance     inflows. However, higher minimum wages and untargeted fiscal support have     also helped protect the vulnerable. With global oil prices falling, the     budgetary costs of the fuel pricing mechanism should be declining. 
              The neutral fiscal stance in 2022 and 2023, underpinning the proposed         budget, balances well the need to support monetary policy in         disinflating the economy while not creating a material drag on         activity.          With the economy currently operating at close to potential and a priority     to restore low and stable inflation, a restrictive monetary stance and     broadly neutral fiscal stance appears to be an appropriate policy mix.     However, contingency plans should be developed so as to have ready targeted     support strategies that could be deployed in the event that downside risks     to activity were to materialize. 
     Policies to Manage Downside Risks  
              There is scope to make the fiscal position more responsive to demand         conditions while maintaining a prudent overall framework          . Mexico’s fiscal framework includes both a balanced budget rule and     constraints on debt issuance, which significantly constrains the ability of     fiscal policy to play a countercyclical role in the event of a downturn.     Modest steps could, however, increase the ability of fiscal policy to provide support in the event that downside risks materialize:     
         ·                      Rebuilding fiscal buffers soon would allow fiscal policy to respond             quickly in the event of a negative shock.               The stabilization fund (    Fondo de Estabilización de los Ingresos Presupuestarios) has less     than 0.1 percent of GDP in resources available to respond in the event that     downside risks are realized—rebuilding these reserves to around 0.3 to 0.5     percent of GDP would increase the ability to respond at a relatively small     fiscal cost. 
              In the event of an unexpected tightening of global financial conditions         and larger capital outflows, peso depreciation would act as a shock         absorber          . With deep foreign exchange (FX) markets and contained FX mismatches in     balance sheets, the economy is expected to remain resilient if downward     pressure on the peso materialized. Policy rate hikes could be used to     counter any marked inflation passthrough or a rise in inflation     expectations, while FX intervention could be considered in the case of     disorderly market conditions. 
              Mexico has a robust financial system but with low levels of financial         inclusion.          Systemic vulnerabilities appear broadly contained and the financial system     is emerging from the pandemic with higher capital buffers, lower private     sector leverage, and no sign of stretched asset prices. However, the system     provides less finance to the real economy than in peer countries although     digital finance, while still embryonic, holds the promise of increasing     financial access. 
              The FSAP found that the financial system appears resilient.          Under the adverse scenario, with low growth and high inflation in major     economies and disruptive global financial tightening, high initial levels     of capital and strong profitability would help banks absorb most credit and     market losses. Liquidity risks for individual banks and other financial     institutions are expected to be well-contained. However, some     areas—contingent credit lines and concentration risks—merit supervisory     attention. System-wide liquidity risks also appear contained, but global     liquidity shocks could generate tail-risks. Overall liquidity conditions     should continue to be monitored carefully and the high reliance on     short-term funding by development banks merits a closer look, though risks     are mitigated by the sovereign guarantee for their liabilities. Risks from     cyber and climate events are important additional concerns. Climate risk     analysis, while uncertain, points to long-term adaptation needs, as in     other parts of the globe. 
              Additional measures would help Mexico remain resilient in a changing         financial and regulatory landscape          . Good progress has been made in rolling out critical Basel reforms,     improving supervisory approaches, building cybersecurity capacity, and     enhancing recovery and resolution planning of commercial banks. The     evolving risk environment flags the need for upgrading the financial sector     oversight and crisis management frameworks to close identified gaps and     address emerging challenges. The FSAP highlights the following     recommendations: 
     (i) Strengthen the autonomy of regulatory government agencies and the legal     protection of supervisors. The evolving risk environment (e.g., climate and     cyber risk) points to the need for increasing the resources and skills in     the regulatory agencies; 
     (ii) The framework for, and application of, consolidated supervision needs     significant enhancement. CNBV could strengthen supervisory techniques by     simplifying and using more principle-based methodologies. Consideration     could be given to integrating climate risks into prudential supervision and     introducing disclosure requirements for firms and investors; 
     (iii) Plans for finalizing and publishing a guideline for the     countercyclical capital buffer are welcome. Action on the process to     introduce limits on loan-to-value and debt-service-to-income ratios would     help to build resilience to housing risks in the medium term as the current     early stage of the financial cycle evolves; 
     (iv) Banxico and CNBV have made significant progress in strengthening the     cyber resilience of the financial system, but further enhancements are     needed on strategy, oversight, implementation, and information sharing.     Continued careful consideration in the design phases of Banxico’s central     bank digital currency project will be needed; 
     (v) Banxico’s approach to liquidity management demonstrated flexibility and     resilience during the pandemic but some refinement of the Emergency     Liquidity Assistance could be considered; and 
     (vi) There is a need to grant power to the resolution authority to remove     impediments to banks’ resolvability and to eliminate barriers to the     effective use of purchase and assumption and bridge bank tools. 
              Policies to encourage financial inclusion should be deepened in order         to combat inequality and support growth.          Recent efforts remain relevant to promote access to financial services     including to broaden access to digital connectivity; and improve the     transparency of financial services. The authorities should continue to     foster entry and expansion of new participants, in particular fintech, to     increase competition in the financial sector, encourage financial     institutions to seek a wider base of customers, and reduce intermediation     costs while maintaining safeguards to ensure financial stability. 
              Enhancing the effectiveness of the AML/CFT framework is the next step         in strengthening the regime.          Mexico has made good progress in aligning its legal and regulatory     framework with Financial Action Task Force standards. The     challenge is now to strengthen enforcement of the AML/CFT regime, including     through adequate resourcing. Efforts should also continue to ensure the     availability of high-quality beneficial ownership information, strengthen     consolidated supervision, and monitor emerging financial integrity risks     related to fintech. 
     Policies for Higher and More Equitable Growth 
              A broader structural policy agenda would enable Mexico to raise         prospects for growth and job creation.          Despite increased trade openness and macroeconomic stability since the     1990s, productivity growth has been weak with the growth in output per     worker averaging close to zero over the past 15 years. In response, the     authorities are seeking to promote trade (including in poorer Southern     regions through infrastructure projects that support trade integration) and     to reduce inequality (through increases in the social pension and the     minimum wage). This agenda will address some obstacles to higher     productivity and growth but additional efforts are needed on: (i)     addressing corruption, crime, and the weak rule of law; (ii) fiscal reforms     to raise human capital and address infrastructure bottlenecks; and (iii)     reducing labor and product market rigidities. 
              Determined implementation of the anticorruption framework would enhance         its effectiveness.          A new law treating corruption and fraud as felony offenses is expected to     enable more comprehensive investigations of corruption. With an     anticorruption framework in place, implementation and assessing     effectiveness of the policies are now the priority. Strengthening     prevention, facilitating reporting including whistleblower protection, and     further empowering institutions in charge of investigation, prosecution,     and oversight can improve implementation. IMF staff encourages Mexico to     participate in the IMF’s voluntary assessment of transnational aspects of     corruption in the next Article IV. Furthermore, strengthening the     enforcement of contracts by the judiciary would support business investment     and job creation. 
              A gradual increase in productive government spending, financed by         policy reforms to raise tax revenues, would promote growth and equity.          Higher spending on education, health, public investment,     and social protection is critical for improving human capital and     infrastructure and narrowing the significant variation in social outcomes     across states. A gradual, permanent increase in public spending of 2 to 3     percent of GDP, would be a feasible step towards achieving Mexico’s     Sustainable Development Goals. To be effective, this higher spending would     need to be accompanied by increased program and public investment     efficiency, building on recent steps taken by the authorities to improve     spending control and program design. For example, the efficiency of social     assistance programs could be strengthened by lowering the sizable leakage     of benefits to high-income groups and reducing overlaps and coverage gaps     across multiple programs (e.g., by creating a single beneficiary registry). 
     There are a range of options to raise tax revenues.     Before the pandemic, Mexico’s non-oil revenues were nearly 6 percent of GDP     below Latin American peers and only about half the OECD average. Recent tax     administration reforms, including through OECD Base Erosion and Profit     Shifting actions, have helped buoy revenues. However, a credible and     well-designed medium-term tax policy reform could generate additional     revenues of 3 to 4 percentage points of GDP without having a deleterious     growth impact. Reforms could draw on the following menu of options: 
     Together, such budget reforms would increase growth and help to maintain a     sound fiscal position (              IMF Staff Report 2021          ). 
              Recent labor market reforms should be adapted to lessen their negative         effects on formal sector employment.          Reductions in the number of qualifying weeks for pension eligibility risk reducing labor supply incentives for older workers. Meanwhile,     informality remains high at 55 percent of the working     population. Based on current policy intentions and     adjusted for expected inflation, minimum wages could increase to the     current median wage levels in the formal sector by 2024, increasing the     incentives for informality. Changes to the current strategy could include:     (i) continuing to improve labor dispute resolution mechanisms, building on     the experience of the 21 states that have already implemented it; (ii)     lowering firing restrictions; (iii) reducing the regulatory costs of     formalizing a business; and (iv) aligning increases in the minimum wage     more closely with expected inflation plus the increase in productivity of     lower wage workers. 
              The implementation of the USMCA trade agreement will help bolster         growth.          The agreement with the U.S. and Canada reduces regulatory divergence,     complementing the elimination of many tariffs under NAFTA. An important     challenge for Mexico will be to increase the domestic value-added content     of exports to meet the tighter rules of origin included in the USMCA     (particularly in the automotive and textile sectors). Strengthening     education and training and fostering greater competition among suppliers     would help increase the attractiveness of Mexico as a supply chain     location, raising the value added of local manufacturing. 
              Putting in place a more predictable energy policy that is more open to         private sector participation would boost competitiveness and         investment.          Reestablishing more market-oriented regulatory frameworks would leverage     Mexico’s large and diverse renewable energy resource base. It would also     incentivize investments that would ultimately create a cheaper, more     reliable, sustainable, and competitive energy supply. 
              Further steps toward carbon pricing would reduce greenhouse emissions.          The expansion in 2023 of the emission trading system (ETS), which is     currently in pilot phase covering a small number of large entities, will be     an important step towards comprehensively pricing emissions. But ensuring     adequate coverage, enforcement, and monitoring of polluting activity,     introducing legally binding emissions caps, and introducing the planned     auction system for allowances are key to making the ETS fully functional.     Further, sectoral measures, such as feebates, public investment in clean     energy infrastructure networks, and regulatory reforms in the energy sector     could increase the impact of carbon pricing. 
PRESS OFFICER: Maria Candia Romano
Phone: +1 202 623-7100Email: [email protected]
@IMFSpokesperson
© 2022 International Monetary Fund. All rights reserved.