Get 14 Days Free
(Alliance News) – Stock prices in Europe closed lower on Tuesday, with jitters in the banking sector re-emerging after less-than-stellar quarterly numbers from US regional lender First Republic.
Banking shares in Europe also fell, with quarterly results from Santander and UBS not receiving rave reviews either.
It was a better day for consumer-focused stocks, however, though Primark owner Associated British Foods was an exception.
The FTSE 100 index lost 21.07 points, or 0.4%, at 7,891.13 on Tuesday. The FTSE 250 slipped 11.55 points, or 0.1%, at 19,215.39, and the AIM All-Share ended down 4.59 points, or 0.6%, at 824.26.
The Cboe UK 100 ended down 0.3% at 789.74, the Cboe UK 250 lost 0.4% at 16,816.77, and the Cboe Small Companies down 0.1% at 13,323.45.
In European equities on Tuesday, the CAC 40 index in Paris lost 0.6%, though the DAX 40 in Frankfurt edged up 0.1%.
Major equity benchmarks in New York were lower. The Dow Jones Industrial Average was down 0.4%, the S&P 500 lost 0.8% and the Nasdaq Composite shed 1.0%.
The pound was quoted at USD1.2404 late Tuesday afternoon in London, lower compared to USD1.2457 at the close on Monday. The euro stood at USD1.0983 down against USD1.1026 late Wednesday. Against the yen, the dollar was trading at JPY133.98, lower compared to JPY134.38.
The yen was on the up amid risk-off trade on Tuesday, while the greenback was supported by President Joe Biden announcing a US re-election bid.
Biden announced Tuesday he is running for re-election in 2024, plunging at the record age of 80 into a ferocious new White House campaign “to finish the job”.
“Every generation has a moment where they have had to stand up for democracy. To stand up for their fundamental freedoms,” Biden wrote on Twitter, along with a video.
A big week for banking sector earnings kicked off with a whimper. Shares for European banking stocks were largely weaker as investors picked apart earnings from Santander and UBS.
Santander fell 6.0% in Madrid. It posted a profit hike though windfall taxes in Spain kept a lid on growth.
Weaker profit in its Brazil division also spooked investors.
UBS lost 2.2%. In its first quarterly report since the hastily-arranged takeover of stricken compatriot Credit Suisse, UBS reported a profit miss.
The Swiss bank reported a net profit of USD1.03 billion in the first quarter of 2023, down 47% from USD1.94 billion in the previous year, and falling short of consensus of USD1.7 billion.
Over in New York, a sharp share price fall for First Republic was one of the major stories. The stock plunged 30%.
First Republic – which announced a major employee downsizing to cut costs – reported deposits of USD104.5 billion at the end of March, a drop of nearly USD72 billion from the level at end-2022.
It is the bank’s first batch of earnings since Silicon Valley Bank’s dramatic collapse in March raised alarm bells about the vulnerabilities of regional lenders.
Also spooking investors, management took no questions during a subsequent earnings call.
Among large-cap London-listed banks, Standard Chartered is the first to report, announcing quarterly results on Wednesday.
While banking earnings underwhelmed, makers of consumer goods impressed. Nestle rose 0.8% in Zurich and PepsiCo was up 2.2% in New York on well-received quarterly figures.
On the up in London, Whitbread shot up 4.6%.
In the financial year that ended March 2, the Premier Inn-owner posted pretax profit of GBP374.9 million, multiplied from GBP58.2 million the year before. Whitbread said this was above pre-pandemic levels, driven primarily by its Premier Inn UK division. Revenue surged to GBP2.63 billion from GBP1.70 billion.
In addition, Whitbread announced a GBP300 million share buyback programme.
Associated British Foods fell 5.1% after setting out a cautious outlook in its Primark retail arm.
The FTSE 100 constituent said it is “cautious about the resilience of consumer spending”, as shoppers face rampant inflationary pressure.
“We expect like-for-like sales growth in the second half, although we expect that growth to moderate from that in the first half,” Chair Michael McLintock said.
Elsewhere in London, Hyve rose 4.2% to 119.80 pence after the events organiser backed a new and improved takeover bid from funds advised by Providence Equity Partners.
The new bid of 121p per share is up from 108p previously. The bid values Hyve at GBP363 million on a fully diluted basis and values it at around GBP524 million on an enterprise basis.
Unbound fell 14% after clothing company WoolOvers Group ruled out making a takeover bid. Unbound in March had said it was in discussions with WoolOvers for a potential bid.
Brent oil was quoted at USD80.52 a barrel at late Tuesday afternoon in London, flat from USD82.10 late Monday. Gold was quoted at USD1,987.63 an ounce, up slightly against USD1,982.78.
Still to come on Tuesday are earnings from Google owner Alphabet and computing firm Microsoft.
Wednesday’s local corporate calendar has first-quarter results from pharmaceutical firm GSK and trading statements from consumer goods company Reckitt Benckiser and housebuilder Persimmon.
The economic diary has a consumer confidence reading from Germany at 0700 BST.
By Eric Cunha, Alliance News news editor
Comments and questions to newsroom@alliancenews.com
Copyright 2023 Alliance News Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
Credit Suisse is the latest—and, by far, the largest—victim of a new confidence crisi…
Low-tier bondholders were wiped out as Swiss authorities facilitated the mega-merger into Credit …
Amid real jitters over the possibility of future banking crises, the deal supposedly alllows UBS …
Credit Suisse shareholders will feel shortchanged, but salvaging at least something is the best o…
Holders of low-ranking Credit Suisse debt are getting wiped out, but its shareholders aren’t. Doe…
Mining companies are operating in a challenging environment but could now be the time to top up o…
THE WEEK: Morningstar columnist Rodney Hobson provides two pieces of advice to George Osborne, an…
Businesses that have competitive advantages within their industry are good candidates for dividen…
Morningstar reveals the top 10 best performers over the last five years
Morningstar OBSR reveals the top funds for investors seeking exposure to European equities
There are many things to consider when picking a great fund to invest in, but knowing what to avo…
Return to physical stores hurting ecommerce retailers, company says, as well as tricky economic c…
It might seem like a good option if you’re looking to improve your credit score, but there are pi…
In January Morningstar initiated coverage of BlackRock’s MyMap fund range, so how does it compare…
Questions tried to elicit information about the inner workings and performance of Berkshire&rsquo…
Alliance News provides Morningstar with continuously updating coverage of news affecting listed companies.
About Us
Connect With Us
Get Help
Terms of Use Privacy Policy Modern Slavery Statement Cookie Settings Disclosures
The Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks is assigned based on an analyst’s estimate of a stocks fair value. It is projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Morningstar assigns star ratings based on an analyst’s estimate of a stock’s fair value. Four components drive the Star Rating: (1) our assessment of the firm’s economic moat, (2) our estimate of the stock’s fair value, (3) our uncertainty around that fair value estimate and (4) the current market price. This process culminates in a single-point star rating that is updated daily. A 5-star represents a belief that the stock is a good value at its current price; a 1-star stock isn’t. If our base-case assumptions are true the market price will converge on our fair value estimate over time, generally within three years. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks, please visit here
Quantitative Fair Value Estimate represents Morningstar’s estimate of the per share dollar amount that a company’s equity is worth today. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is based on a statistical model derived from the Fair Value Estimate Morningstar’s equity analysts assign to companies which includes a financial forecast of the company. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is calculated daily. It is a projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Quantiative Fair Value Estimate, please visit here
The Morningstar Medalist Rating is the summary expression of Morningstar’s forward-looking analysis of investment strategies as offered via specific vehicles using a rating scale of Gold, Silver, Bronze, Neutral, and Negative. The Medalist Ratings indicate which investments Morningstar believes are likely to outperform a relevant index or peer group average on a risk-adjusted basis over time. Investment products are evaluated on three key pillars (People, Parent, and Process) which, when coupled with a fee assessment, forms the basis for Morningstar’s conviction in those products’ investment merits and determines the Medalist Rating they’re assigned. Pillar ratings take the form of Low, Below Average, Average, Above Average, and High. Pillars may be evaluated via an analyst’s qualitative assessment (either directly to a vehicle the analyst covers or indirectly when the pillar ratings of a covered vehicle are mapped to a related uncovered vehicle) or using algorithmic techniques. Vehicles are sorted by their expected performance into rating groups defined by their Morningstar Category and their active or passive status. When analysts directly cover a vehicle, they assign the three pillar ratings based on their qualitative assessment, subject to the oversight of the Analyst Rating Committee, and monitor and reevaluate them at least every 14 months. When the vehicles are covered either indirectly by analysts or by algorithm, the ratings are assigned monthly. For more detailed information about these ratings, including their methodology, please go to here
The Morningstar Medalist Ratings are not statements of fact, nor are they credit or risk ratings. The Morningstar Medalist Rating (i) should not be used as the sole basis in evaluating an investment product, (ii) involves unknown risks and uncertainties which may cause expectations not to occur or to differ significantly from what was expected, (iii) are not guaranteed to be based on complete or accurate assumptions or models when determined algorithmically, (iv) involve the risk that the return target will not be met due to such things as unforeseen changes in changes in management, technology, economic development, interest rate development, operating and/or material costs, competitive pressure, supervisory law, exchange rate, tax rates, exchange rate changes, and/or changes in political and social conditions, and (v) should not be considered an offer or solicitation to buy or sell the investment product. A change in the fundamental factors underlying the Morningstar Medalist Rating can mean that the rating is subsequently no longer accurate.
For information on the historical Morningstar Medalist Rating for any managed investment Morningstar covers, please contact your local Morningstar office.
For more detailed information about conflicts of interest, including EU MAR disclosures, please see the “Morningstar Medalist Rating Analyst Conflict of Interest & Other Disclosures for EMEA”here