Abortion Pill Still Under Legal Threat - Free Websites, Share News And Posts Publicly

//sli.reutersmedia.net/imp?s=126850200&li=&e=gjjtuyu768@gmail.com&p=35707469&lctg=64158878abe57c7b7c0f362f&stpe=pixel” width=”2″ height=”6″ border=”0″ />

//sli.reutersmedia.net/imp?s=126850201&li=&e=gjjtuyu768@gmail.com&p=35707469&lctg=64158878abe57c7b7c0f362f&stpe=pixel” width=”2″ height=”6″ border=”0″ />

//sli.reutersmedia.net/imp?s=126850202&li=&e=gjjtuyu768@gmail.com&p=35707469&lctg=64158878abe57c7b7c0f362f&stpe=pixel” width=”2″ height=”6″ border=”0″ />

//sli.reutersmedia.net/imp?s=126850203&li=&e=gjjtuyu768@gmail.com&p=35707469&lctg=64158878abe57c7b7c0f362f&stpe=pixel” width=”2″ height=”6″ border=”0″ />

//sli.reutersmedia.net/imp?s=126850204&li=&e=gjjtuyu768@gmail.com&p=35707469&lctg=64158878abe57c7b7c0f362f&stpe=pixel” width=”2″ height=”6″ border=”0″ />

June 13, 2024

//sli.reutersmedia.net/imp?s=878659&li=&e=gjjtuyu768@gmail.com&p=35707469&lctg=64158878abe57c7b7c0f362f&stpe=static” border=”0″ style=”max-height:12px;” />

What’s going on today?

Musk may have convinced Tesla investors to back his pay. Now he must persuade a judge.
Apple accused of underpaying female workers in California.
Plus, three U.S. Supreme Court opinions.

Do you love the Afternoon Docket? Think we could do some things better? Take our brief survey and let us know what you’d like to see.

Abortion pill still under legal threat despite U.S. Supreme Court ruling

REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein/File Photo

The U.S. Supreme Court‘s ruling today keeping mifepristone on the market with no new restrictions ends one chapter of the legal fight over the abortion drug, but efforts by abortion opponents to restrict its use may not be over, Brendan Pierson reports.

In rejecting a lawsuit by anti-abortion medical groups and doctors, the Supreme Court did not rule on their claim that the FDA acted improperly when it eased restrictions on mifepristone. Instead, the court found they had not shown that they had suffered the kind of harm that would allow them to bring a lawsuit.

Normally, that would be the end of the case, but last November U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk allowed three Republican-led states that ban abortion to join the case as plaintiffs. Now, those states can try to go forward on their own. Read more about what’s next.

More from SCOTUS today:

More top news:

//sli.reutersmedia.net/imp?s=878654&li=&e=gjjtuyu768@gmail.com&p=35707469&lctg=64158878abe57c7b7c0f362f&stpe=static” border=”0″ style=”max-height:12px;” />

‘Baby Reindeer’ is Netflix’s latest defamation headache

When a woman who claims she was defamed over her portrayal as Martha in “Baby Reindeer” sued Netflix last week for at least $170 million, she joined a litany of other defamation plaintiffs taking aim at the streaming service. In her latest column, Jenna Greene looks at what’s required to make the claims stick and why the “Baby Reindeer” suit by plaintiff Fiona Harvey may, as one lawyer put it, “give a lot of folks at Netflix quite a bit of heartburn.”

Check out other recent pieces from our columnists: Alison Frankel and Jenna Greene

In other news …

Pro-Trump influencers fire up fears of migrant “invasion” ahead of U.S. election … G7 agrees on a loan deal to support Ukraine with Russian assets … Israeli forces advance deeper into Rafah as diplomacy falters … Senior Hamas leader says proposed amendments to Gaza ceasefire “not significant” … Famine watchdog projects 756,000 Sudanese face starvation in coming months … Learning from Myanmar’s rebels, junta builds new Chinese drone fleet … Wild horses return to Kazakhstan’s Golden Steppe after some 200 years … A wildfire scorched the world’s largest wetland … NASA accidentally broadcasts a simulation of distressed astronauts on the space station … And the “Bridgerton” showrunner teases an “extremely juicy” fourth season.