A Belarusian court sentenced Nasta Loika, the founder of the human rights organization Human Constanta, to seven years in a penal colony on Tuesday.
The court found Loika guilty of “inciting social hatred.” Viasna, a Belarusian human rights organization, reports that the prosecution in the case alleges that Loika gave a “negative assessment” of illegal police actions in a human rights report, which incited violence against the police. The trial was closed to media and had only limited public viewing space available.
UN Special Rapporteur on Human Rights Defenders Mary Lawlor condemned the sentencing, saying, “This appalling verdict is a new step in Belarus’ crackdown on civil society & HRDs [human rights defenders].”
Svetlana Tikhanovskaya, a prominent exiled Belarusian opposition party leader who was tried in absentia, praised Loika for her dedication to the people of Belarus, saying, “She represented the interests of Belarusians who suffered from discrimination, violence or persecution, and spoke loudly about the problems that the regime likes to ignore. Nasta was the voice of those who were not heard, and hope for those who needed help.”
Loika has been held under “administrative detention” since October 2022. Viasna alleges that Loika was hit with a taser during her detention and left out in freezing temperatures without proper clothing. Some of these claims have been corroborated by witnesses including Russian journalist Yekaterina Yanshina, who was detained in the same prison. Yanshina said:
As I was told later, the woman, who simply forgot her password, was tortured with electric shocks. They were firing a stun gun at her heel to avoid leaving marks. It was the human rights activist Anastasiya Loika. I was told this story after I refused to give my passwords. And then I wondered how many zaps I would take before breaking up and giving them the passwords.
This is not Loika’s first time in detention, having been previously accused of “petty hooliganism.” Belarusian authorities have allegedly subject her to torture and ill-treatment repeatedly throughout her various detentions.
Viasna has reported that Loika is planning to appeal her conviction and sentencing.
The international community has repeatedly condemned Belarus for its arbitrary detention of political dissidents, human rights defenders and journalists. The UN has repeatedly condemned Belarus’ treatment and arbitrary detention of political prisoners. In March, a Belarusian court sentenced journalist Gennady Mozheyk to three years in prison for allegedly insulting Belarusian authorities. In 2020, Nobel Peace Prize laureate Ales Bialiatski was sentenced to ten years in prison for allegedly helping to fund anti-government protests. And JURIST correspondent Ulyana Belaya shared her account of the detention of an anonymous Belarusian university student, who alleged she experienced poor treatment including lack of medicine, improper nutrition, humiliation and abusive guards.
According to JURIST correspondents in Belarus, there are currently over 1,440 political prisoners in the country.
Myanmar dispatch: A red rose for Aung San Suu Kyi
India dispatch: Law Commission report recommends retaining archaic penal provision amid calls for repeal
Jallikattu: The Doom of Animal Rights in India?
Afghanistan’s Justice System in Jeopardy as Women Lawyers Forced to Cease Practice
Interview: Lack of Legal Representation For Women, By Women
Imran Khan’s Arrest and Pakistan’s Struggle for Democracy
France signed armistice agreement with Nazi Germany
On June 22, 1940, France signed an armistice agreement with Nazi Germany ending hostilities between the two states after Germany’s invasion of France, recognizing the German occupation of northern France and continued French jurisdiction in the south under the collaborative Vichy government. Read the armistice agreement here.
Supreme Court rules suspects have right to attorney during questioning
On June 22, 1964, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Escobedo v. Illinois that suspects have the right to an attorney while they are questioned by police. Danny Escobedo eventually confessed to the murder of his brother-in-law after being detained for hours without access to his lawyer. Over the course of the interrogation, police denied Escobedo’s repeated requests to speak with his lawyer and denied the lawyer’s requests to speak with his client. The Supreme Court overturned Escobedo’s confession on the ground that it violated his “absolute right to remain silent”.