Navigation
Search
Change language and content customisation
Find an advisor
Get in touch
Find an office
Search for:
Jump straight to:
Please enter a search term
We can use your selection to show you more of the content that you’re interested in.
Sign-up to follow topics, sectors, people and also have the option to receive a weekly update of lastest news across your areas of interest.
Got an account already?
Search for:
Please enter a search term
Out-Law Analysis | 10 Aug 2022 | 1:42 pm | 3 min. read
Luxembourg is known for its large number of inbound German, French and Belgian cross-border workers, with official figures showing over 210,000 such workers based in Luxembourg in 2021.
Many employees are currently requesting to be able to work remotely, and employers must address these demands in order to remain competitive and attract the best talent. However, cross-border working presents particular administrative and legal challenges which these employers may have to take steps to mitigate.
The Luxembourg convention on teleworking of 20 October 2020 introduced ‘regular’ and ‘occasional’ remote working concepts. For the purposes of the convention, regular remote work is when at least 10% of an employee’s working time takes place remotely and requires a written agreement.
The mandatory national labour law provisions applicable to those working remotely in Luxembourg while resident in another country depends on how much of that employee’s work is actually done from the other country.
Where less than 50% of an employee’s working time is spent teleworking from their country of residence:
Where more than 50% of an employee’s working time is spent teleworking from their country of residence:
One area in which this will be increasingly relevant is in relation to the so-called ‘right to disconnect’, draft legislation on which is currently making its way through the Luxembourg legislature (bill no. 7890). Employers should pay particular attention to these new rules when implementing a policy around teleworking, particularly given the enhanced flexibility these employees are likely to have over organising their work and availability.
In view of the recent partial legalisation of private consumption of cannabis at home in Luxembourg, Luxembourg employers must also ensure that their telework policies fully prohibit any cannabis consumption during the employee’s working hours or to the extent that it would impact on the employee’s fitness for work, as well as any sanctions that may be imposed for breaches.
When setting terms and conditions for cross-border remote workers, employers must observe EU rules on the coordination of social security and applicable bilateral tax treaties along with national labour laws and the Luxembourg convention. However, the application and coordination of different thresholds of applicability may be challenging for employers.
The EU regulation on the coordination of social security rules across borders provides that employees should be affiliated to one national social security regime. In principle, this will be the EU member state in which their employer is based. However, if at least 25% of an employee’s work is performed in the employee’s country of residence, the employee should be affiliated to the social security scheme of their country of residence.
Agreements that Luxembourg has negotiated with neighbouring countries for the avoidance of double taxation must also be observed. Annual limits on remote work have been set to prevent income taxation in the employee’s country of residence and associated administrative burdens for the employer, such as pay slip adjustments and reporting obligations. These are:
The application of these thresholds was suspended at the height of the Covid-19 pandemic but, as of 1 July 2022, they are now again fully applicable. The French and German governments have officially confirmed that the thresholds will not be pro-rated for the remaining months of 2022. However, the Belgian government is yet to officially confirm its position, meaning uncertainty remains over the threshold application until the end of the year.
Co-written by Breeze Van Eck of Pinsent Masons.
Written by
Muriel Piquard
Legal Director
Out-Law News
22 Mar 2022
Out-Law Analysis
16 Jun 2022
Sign-up to receive the latest news, insight and analysis direct to your e-mail inbox
Out-Law News
A legal expert has welcomed the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) to limit the scope of EU data collection rules designed to fight terrorism and serious crime.
Out-Law News
Singapore’s High Court has overturned a decision to award work injury compensation to the family of a man who died of a heart attack during working hours.
Out-Law News
Jon Coley tells HRNews about the EAT’s decision in Ineos Infrastructure Grangemouth Ltd v Jones on s145B TULRCA
Out-Law Analysis
A global view of the law applicable to an arbitration agreement
Out-Law Analysis
Algorithmic pricing raises concerns for EU competition law enforcement
Out-Law Analysis
As EU Council decides fate of trade talks, what exactly has been agreed so far?
Rechtsanwalt, Legal Director
Out-Law Analysis
BREXIT: Post-Brexit pensions regulation would require balancing of business burdens and consumer protections, says expert
Rechtsanwältin
Rechtsanwalt, Senior Associate
Out-Law Guide
Complying with directors' remuneration report disclosures
2022 Copyright Pinsent Masons LLP
We use cookies that are essential for our site to work. To improve our website, we would like to use additional cookies to help us understand how visitors use the site, measure traffic to our site from social media platforms and to personalise your experience. Some of the cookies that we use are provided by third parties. Please visit our Cookie Policy for more information. To accept all cookies click 'Accept all'. To reject all optional cookies or choose which optional cookies to allow, click ‘Cookie settings’. This tool uses a cookie to remember your choices.
See our Cookie Policy for more information