THERE were splits in Labour over Alister Jack’s decision to block the Scottish Parliament’s Gender Recognition Reform Bill.
In Holyrood, Monica Lennon described it as a “cynical and dangerous power move by an out of control UK government.”
However, in the Commons, the Labour MP Rosie Duffield welcomed the invoking of the Section 35 order, saying the law passed by MSPs “clearly conflicts with the Equality Act and would have repercussions for women across the UK.”
In last month’s debate and vote on the legislation, 18 of Labour’s 22 MSPs backed the change in law, with two voting against and two others not voting.
The Bill simplifies the process for obtaining a gender recognition certificate, by removing the need for a gender dysphoria diagnosis, and cutting back on the amount of time a trans person needs to live in their acquired gender.
It also changes the age at which a trans person can apply for a GRC from 18 to 16.
Over the weekend, Sir Keir Starmer said he had concerns about some of the changes, particularly the drop in age limit.
He told the BBC: “I have concerns about the provision in Scotland, in particular the age reduction to 16 and in particular the rejection of our amendment in relation to the Equalities Act.”
When asked whether he would block the Scottish legislation if he was prime minister. He said he wanted to wait to see what legal advice the UK Government had received.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer showing ‘utter contempt’ for Labour MSPs over gender laws
Speaking to the Daily Record, Ms Lennon, said she was “disappointed” with the party leader’s comments.
She said: “The Bill was also supported by the Labour group of MSPs, who supported lowering the age threshold from 18 to 16. His comments have undermined Scottish Labour and are unhelpful in terms of the wider debate on equalities.”
Her Holyrood colleague Paul Sweeney disagreed.
“I don’t think we feel undermined,” he told The Herald. “I think we feel undermined by the UK Government, first and foremost.”
He said: “We’ve had conversations with colleagues. I’m working with MPs and we’re trying to get ourselves into a place where they understand what is a fast-moving issue. I guess not everyone’s been across this matter.
“I think the fundamental that we need to recognise is that the matter for deciding the merits of the gender recognition reform here in Scotland is for MSPs.
“The issue here that we need support from everyone who supports devolution is on this principle that a Section 35 is an overreach and should not have been used.”
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon confirms judicial review bid over gender reforms veto
In the Commons, following Mr Jack’s statement, Ms Duffield, who has long been critical of changes to the GRA, said that the Scottish legislation would “allow anyone at all to legally self-identify as either sex and therefore enter all spaces, including those necessarily segregated by sex, such as domestic violence settings, changing rooms and prisons.”
She was heckled by colleague Ben Bradshaw who described the claim as “absolute rubbish.”
Ms Duffield said on Twitter afterwards: “Being shouted down in the Chamber by @UKLabour men who clearly don’t want women to speak up for our rights to single sex spaces. How very progressive.
“Should probably point out that the SNP men were also yelling, but I expected that of course.”
READ MORE: Shona Robison: ‘Tory Section 35 order a dark day for trans rights’
Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi, a shadow Northern Ireland minister, accused Nicola Sturgeon of using women as “pawns” in her “constitutional game playing”.
The party’s Shadow Scotland secretary Ian Murray said the legislation had “turned into a constitutional bun fight.”
In Holyrood, Ms Lennon told MSPs the Bill was about “dignity, fairness and equality for a marginalised group of trans citizens.”
“The Secretary of State may hide behind legal advice, but the truth is, the Tories at Westminster have proven that they are no offence to trans people, and as the architects of the rape clause, we know they are no friends to women and girls.”
This was “a cynical and dangerous power move by an out of control UK government’s determined to wreck this bill at any costs,” she added.
In Wales, the Labour First Minister suggested his ministers would support the Scottish government if the matter ends up in the Supreme Court.
He told members of the Senedd: The UK government’s decision to use powers that have never been used in the history of devolution is a very dangerous moment.”
“I agree with the First Minister of Scotland that this could be a very slippery slope indeed.”
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland’s conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don’t want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Last Updated:
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?
This website and associated newspapers adhere to the Independent Press Standards Organisation’s Editors’ Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about the editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then please contact the editor here. If you are dissatisfied with the response provided you can contact IPSO here
© 2001-2023. This site is part of Newsquest’s audited local newspaper network. A Gannett Company. Newsquest Media Group Ltd, 1st Floor, Chartist Tower, Upper Dock Street, Newport, Wales, NP20 1DW Registered in England & Wales | 01676637 |
Data returned from the Piano ‘meterActive/meterExpired’ callback event.
As a subscriber, you are shown 80% less display advertising when reading our articles.
Those ads you do see are predominantly from local businesses promoting local services.
These adverts enable local businesses to get in front of their target audience – the local community.
It is important that we continue to promote these adverts as our local businesses need as much support as possible during these challenging times.