Link copied.
We want to bridge divides to reach everyone.
Already a subscriber? Log in to hide ads.
A selection of the most viewed stories this week on the Monitor’s website.
Every Saturday
Hear about special editorial projects, new product information, and upcoming events.
Occasional
Select stories from the Monitor that empower and uplift.
Every Weekday
An update on major political events, candidates, and parties twice a week.
Twice a Week
Stay informed about the latest scientific discoveries & breakthroughs.
Every Tuesday
A weekly digest of Monitor views and insightful commentary on major events.
Every Thursday
Latest book reviews, author interviews, and reading trends.
Every Friday
A weekly update on music, movies, cultural trends, and education solutions.
Every Thursday
The three most recent Christian Science articles with a spiritual perspective.
Every Monday
Loading…
September 7, 2022 | Singapore
In a move lauded by LGBTQ rights advocates globally, Singapore is scrapping Section 377A of the penal code, a colonial-era law that criminalizes sex between men. Offenders could be jailed for up to two years, although the law has not been actively enforced in years.
“Section 377A was the guillotine over all our heads,” says Azimin Saini, a branding and content specialist. “It made us feel a little less human, a little less welcome in this nation.”
In Singapore, the repeal of a colonial-era law criminalizing gay sex restores a sense of dignity to the LGBTQ community, but equality remains elusive.
But the change comes with a catch. In a compromise with conservative and religious groups, lawmakers will also be revising the constitution to protect the definition of marriage between a man and a woman, creating significant hurdles for marriage equality.
Writer and LGBTQ rights activist Ng Yi-Sheng says that LGBTQ communities and allies must rethink the path to equality. Many hope the long-awaited repeal will pave the way for constructive dialogue between LGBTQ communities and conservative religious groups, and also improve media representation.
“The way [lawmakers] have constructed a big barrier to marriage makes a lot of people think we should be fighting for marriage,” he says, “but there are all these other, less flashy things we can fight for that can also materially improve lives.”
For years, Azimin Saini struggled to sing Singapore’s national anthem with pride.
As a gay man, Mr. Azimin says his home country has long regarded him as a criminal, but on Aug. 21, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong announced Singapore would scrap Section 377A of the penal code, a colonial-era law from the 1930s that criminalizes sex between men. The widely anticipated move effectively legalizes homosexuality in Singapore.
“I don’t think there was a single gay Singaporean man who didn’t weep. Section 377A was the guillotine over all our heads. It made us feel a little less human, a little less welcome in this nation,” says Mr. Azimin, a branding and content specialist.
In Singapore, the repeal of a colonial-era law criminalizing gay sex restores a sense of dignity to the LGBTQ community, but equality remains elusive.
Under Section 377A, offenders could be jailed for up to two years, although the law has not been actively enforced in years.
The move is lauded by the LGBTQ community globally and rights advocates in the Southeast Asian nation. However, the change comes with a catch. In a compromise with conservative and religious groups, Singapore will also be revising its constitution to protect the definition of marriage between a man and a woman, creating significant hurdles for marriage equality.
This will make it impossible for LGBTQ advocates to mount constitutional challenges in the courts, like those that led to the legalization of same-sex marriage in Taiwan, the first country in Asia to do so, and in the United States.
Writer and LGBTQ rights activist Ng Yi-Sheng says that for LGBTQ communities and allies, the challenge will be rethinking the path to equality. “The way [lawmakers] have constructed a big barrier to marriage makes a lot of people think we should be fighting for marriage, but there are all these other less flashy things we can fight for that can also materially improve lives,” he says.
He adds that Singapore’s two-pronged approach could have far-reaching consequences, noting that the city-state is often regarded as a model for developing nations and Section 377 remains in force in other former British colonies in Asia such as Malaysia, Brunei, Myanmar, and Bangladesh.
Singapore’s pragmatic brand of secularism, which guarantees freedom of religion while also ensuring that religious views have a place in public life, is an increasingly tough balancing act for a country keen to position itself as an inclusive global business hub. In the same speech where Mr. Lee announced that repealing 377A “is the right thing to do” and “something that most Singaporeans will now accept,” he also vowed to “uphold and safeguard the institution of marriage” through constitutional amendment.
“This will help us to repeal Section 377A in a controlled and carefully considered way,” he added.
The proposed amendment gives Parliament the power to determine the definition of marriage, which forms the basis of many policies in Singapore from media content and advertising standards to public housing, education, and adoption.
It’s less extreme than enshrining the heterosexual definition directly into the constitution, as requested by some religious groups. Yet, with the conservative People’s Action Party holding a supermajority in government, marriage equality is not likely to happen in the near future.
For some queer couples, the compromise is a stark reminder that they still face significant barriers to equality.
“What matters is that my partner and I can be recognized as a legal unit, because there are very real issues at stake here,” says Mr. Azimin. “Can we buy a house together as a couple rather than as two unrelated singles? When one of us passes away, what happens then?”
LGBTQ counseling nonprofit Oogachaga responded in a statement that “there is no need for families and marriage to be protected from the LGBTQ community, as many of us are already in them.”
But in a country known for its conservative values, Mr. Lee’s announcement still came as a welcome surprise to many Singaporeans.
“Actually, I think the government is brave about this,” says content editor Dorothy Tan. “I’m a moderate, so I don’t expect sweeping changes overnight. It makes sense that it is a series of compromises – as long as it is in the direction of tolerance.”
“If the government is committed to going down this path,” the mother of two young children opines, “it should think of alternative legal partnerships to reduce discrimination against gay couples without antagonizing people who are so caught up in what ‘marriage’ is.”
Despite the marriage setback, for LGBTQ rights advocates, the repeal of 377A marks a long-overdue, pivotal moment after decades of advocacy. More than 20 LGBTQ groups issued a joint statement, calling it “the first step on a long road towards full equality.”
Moving forward, co-founder of LGBTQ youth group Young OUT Here Benjamin Xue believes it will be key to establish a common space for religious conservatives and the LGBTQ community to talk frankly about Singapore’s future. “Right now we’ve seen a lot of hurtful rhetoric coming from religious conservatives, invalidating our lived experiences, hurt, and trauma,” he says. “LGBTQ people are religious too, and are also a part of Singapore’s social fabric.”
Despite the government asserting that policies on media content will not change, the LGBTQ community still harbors the hope that the repeal will pave the way for better media representation.
“Accurate portrayals and representation on mainstream media will allow LGBTQ youth to imagine a brighter future for themselves,” says Mr. Xue, “and at the same time let the mainstream majority understand the LGBTQ community a little better, creating more opportunities for empathy.”
Get stories that
empower and uplift daily.
Already a subscriber? Log in to hide ads.
Mr. Ng, the writer and rights activist, agrees. “I think for a lot of people, there’s discomfort because of unfamiliarity,” he says. “It’s a similar discomfort when there’s a new form of music or technology. A lot of people still don’t have gay friends. Older generations are also more reluctant to openly express or support it. Time and exposure will change this.”
He also hopes the repeal will make more people in prominent and influential positions feel comfortable about coming out to show “straight people that there’s nothing shameful being queer.”
Already a subscriber? Login
Monitor journalism changes lives because we open that too-small box that most people think they live in. We believe news can and should expand a sense of identity and possibility beyond narrow conventional expectations.
Our work isn’t possible without your support.
Already a subscriber? Login
Link copied.
We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.
Dear Reader,
About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:
“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”
If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.
But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.
The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.
We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”
If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.
Subscribe to insightful journalism
Already a subscriber? Log in to hide ads.
A selection of the most viewed stories this week on the Monitor’s website.
Every Saturday
Hear about special editorial projects, new product information, and upcoming events.
Occasional
Select stories from the Monitor that empower and uplift.
Every Weekday
An update on major political events, candidates, and parties twice a week.
Twice a Week
Stay informed about the latest scientific discoveries & breakthroughs.
Every Tuesday
A weekly digest of Monitor views and insightful commentary on major events.
Every Thursday
Latest book reviews, author interviews, and reading trends.
Every Friday
A weekly update on music, movies, cultural trends, and education solutions.
Every Thursday
The three most recent Christian Science articles with a spiritual perspective.
Every Monday
Follow us:
Your subscription to The Christian Science Monitor has expired. You can renew your subscription or continue to use the site without a subscription.
Return to the free version of the site
If you have questions about your account, please contact customer service or call us at 1-617-450-2300.
This message will appear once per week unless you renew or log out.
Your session to The Christian Science Monitor has expired. We logged you out.
Return to the free version of the site
If you have questions about your account, please contact customer service or call us at 1-617-450-2300.
You don’t have a Christian Science Monitor subscription yet.
Return to the free version of the site
If you have questions about your account, please contact customer service or call us at 1-617-450-2300.