//sli.reutersmedia.net/imp?s=126850200&li=&e=gjjtuyu768@gmail.com&p=36120496&lctg=64158878abe57c7b7c0f362f&stpe=pixel” width=”2″ height=”6″ border=”0″ /> |
//sli.reutersmedia.net/imp?s=126850201&li=&e=gjjtuyu768@gmail.com&p=36120496&lctg=64158878abe57c7b7c0f362f&stpe=pixel” width=”2″ height=”6″ border=”0″ /> |
//sli.reutersmedia.net/imp?s=126850202&li=&e=gjjtuyu768@gmail.com&p=36120496&lctg=64158878abe57c7b7c0f362f&stpe=pixel” width=”2″ height=”6″ border=”0″ /> |
//sli.reutersmedia.net/imp?s=126850203&li=&e=gjjtuyu768@gmail.com&p=36120496&lctg=64158878abe57c7b7c0f362f&stpe=pixel” width=”2″ height=”6″ border=”0″ /> |
//sli.reutersmedia.net/imp?s=126850204&li=&e=gjjtuyu768@gmail.com&p=36120496&lctg=64158878abe57c7b7c0f362f&stpe=pixel” width=”2″ height=”6″ border=”0″ /> |
|
|
|
//sli.reutersmedia.net/imp?s=878659&li=&e=gjjtuyu768@gmail.com&p=36120496&lctg=64158878abe57c7b7c0f362f&stpe=static” border=”0″ style=”max-height:12px;” /> |
|
|
|
|
|
What’s going on today?
Have a great weekend!
|
REUTERS/Will Dunham/File Photo
|
Over its past two terms, the U.S. Supreme Court has put an end to five high-profile and politically sensitive cases emerging from one particular federal appeals court on the same basis, declaring that the litigation should not have been allowed in the first place. Read more from Supreme Court reporter Andrew Chung.
In all five cases – involving abortion rights, online free speech, federal student loans, immigration and Native American child welfare – the justices overturned rulings by the staunchly conservative New Orleans-based 5th Circuit or judges within that circuit. In doing so, the Supreme Court sent a message to the 5th Circuit, which handles appeals from federal courts in the Republican-led states of Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi, and the entire U.S. judiciary to tighten up on legal standing.
More top news:
|
|
|
//sli.reutersmedia.net/imp?s=878654&li=&e=gjjtuyu768@gmail.com&p=36120496&lctg=64158878abe57c7b7c0f362f&stpe=static” border=”0″ style=”max-height:12px;” /> |
|
|
|
|
|
REUTERS/Tom Brenner/File Photo
|
|
|
A lawsuit against Citigroup for waiving its $3 out-of-network ATM fee for customers of certain credit unions and community banks, most of them minority-owned, strikes Jenna Greene as an instance of no good deed going unpunished. In her latest column, Greene looks at a proposed class action against Citi by Consovoy McCarthy, which claims the fees discriminate against customers of banks owned by people of the “wrong race” – and why the litigation boutique may face an uphill fight in making the claims stick.
Check out other recent pieces from our columnists: Alison Frankel and Jenna Greene
|
|
|
|