Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
Advertisement
Scientific Reports volume 12, Article number: 18586 (2022)
Metrics details
The production of renewable and sustainable biofuels using inevitable wastes is a promising alternative to the alarming depletion of fossil fuels. Significantly, the sustainable biorefinery of lignocellulosic waste, as an alternative fuel source, is a prognosticating approach to tackle many agricultural/forestry residues and offers a circular economy as well as environmental benefits. But, the heterogeneity of lignocellulosic biomass is one of the major bottlenecks in lignocellulosic biorefinery. Thus the characterization of lignocellulosic biomass is essential to understanding the feedstock’s nature, composition and suitability for biofuel production. The present study taps evergreen spiny non-edible pods of Prosopis juliflora (Pj) as an energy feedstock. Proximate, ultimate and biochemical characterization of Pj pods were conducted, and thermal behaviour and calorific values were determined. Cellulose and hemicellulose were isolated and characterized by reliable methods. The overall characterization has revealed the Pj pods as a potential feedstock for bioenergy. The collected Pj pods contain (% w/w) moisture 7.89 ± 0.002, volatile matter 87.67 ± 0.002, ash 0.21 ± 0.002, fixed carbon 4.23 ± 0.002 with a calorific value of 17.62 kg/MJ. The CHNS content was (w/w %) carbon 41.77, nitrogen 3.58, sulfur 26.3 and hydrogen 6.55. The biochemical composition analysis yields (% w/w) on a dry basis; cellulose 26.6 ± 0.18, hemicellulose 30.86 ± 0.27, lignin 4.71 ± 0.12, protein 11.63 ± 0.12 and starch 1.1 ± 0.06 and extractives 30.56 ± 0.008. The isolated cellulose and hemicellulose were analyzed and confirmed by CP/MAS &1H NMR, FTIR, TG-DSC, SEM, XRD, and TGA. The present results revealed that the tested biomass, Prosopis juliflora, could be used as a feedstock in biorefinery for bioenergy.
The foundation of modern civilization, energy is essential to most human activities. Modernizing our lives and cities would not have been possible without energy1. Energy demand is anticipated to increase by around 50% over the next 20 years, with predictions of 778 EJ by 20352. But the exhaustion of fossil fuels and the subsequent increase in greenhouse gas emissions have become urgent problems3. These harmful greenhouse gases also harm human health because they cause cancer4. Thus finding an alternative energy source that can satisfy energy needs also be environmentally benign is vital4. In contrast to other environmentally friendly energy sources, including wind, solar, geothermal, marine, and hydropower, biomass may directly produce fuel and chemicals5.
Lignocellulosic biomass comes in various wastes, including woody, aquatic detritus, farm manure and byproducts, and agricultural wastes6. The energy from the lignocellulosic biomass is greatly interesting since it is abundantly available, technically feasible and economically viable7. Several technologies, including gasification, combustion, pyrolysis, enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation, are employed to turn biomass into fuel and platform chemicals3. Thermochemical processes often demand a large amount of energy, including a solvent or catalyst. In contrast, the biochemical approach has a protracted time and has less effective at breaking down the resistant biomass3. Various lignocellulosic biomass like sugarcane bagasse8, berry waste2, jatropha seeds9, sunflower straw10, sorghum stem11, rice straw12, waste peach pulp13, wheat straw14, corn stover15 and so forth have been studied for the effective production of biofuels.
The lignocellulosic feedstock contains majorly cellulose 40–50%, hemicellulose 25–35% and lignin 15–20%16. Cellulose is the primary polymer that contains long chains of cellobiose units, a renewable resource that is safe for the environment, inexpensive, non-toxic, biodegradable, and biocompatible3,17. Hemicellulose comprises monosaccharides such as mannose, galactose, arabinose, glucose, rhamnose, xylose and uranic acid18. Lignin is a high molecular weight, complex structure containing cross-linked phenolic monomers that provide cell wall rigidity, impermeability and resistance against microbial attack19.
The lignocellulosic biomass usage in biorefineries for biofuels offers reduced greenhouse gas emissions, zero waste generation and significant sustainability in the circular bioeconomy4. Nevertheless, there is a constant demand for environment-friendly disposal or refinery of various lignocellulosic biomass20. From the standpoint of waste valorization, the fractionation of this lignocellulosic residue into cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin is the primary step for producing a variety of products with a higher economic value, such as biofuel, cosmetics, biodegradable films, paper, and plastic materials, while minimising the associated environmental impacts19.
One of the most promising technologies for converting lignocellulosic biomass into high-value products like biochar, syngas, and bio-oil without oxygen is pyrolysis21. By recycling trash using pyrolysis to create biochar, energy, and value-added goods, agricultural and animal waste disposal can lessen its negative environmental effects22. Biochar production from lignocellulose is simple, reliable, technically feasible and commercially viable23. Using biochar as a feed for animal growth reduces methane formation and enhances anaerobic digestion23.
The present study aims to exploit one such lignocellulosic biomass, Prosopis juliflora pods, for its suitability as bioenergy feedstock. The Prosopis juliflora (Pj) plant is a drought-tolerant, evergreen tree with drooping branches of the Leguminosae family as an energy stock24. The native of the Pj pods to arid and semi-arid regions of the world. Pj plants have been colonized in many countries, such as North America, Africa and Asia. Pj plants have flexible branches, a green–brown, a twisted stem, and curving multi-seeded pods with a hardened pericarp and flattened25. Pj plants can survive in a very harsh and poor soil environment, control erosion, improve soil fertility, and reduce soil salinity in drylands. Due to invasive properties, Pj plants grow as much as 9 m in length and 50 cm in diameter. The fruit is a non-dehiscent curved pod of 10–15 cm in length, 0.8–1.0 cm in width, 2–4 mm thick, and contains a hard endocarp, soft and heavy mesocarp and woody endocarp with many seeds24. The pods generated by the Prosopis species are legume pods containing high levels of carbohydrates, protein, and starch used as animal feed for the past decades. Prosopis species are made up of exocarps, fibrous endocarps and fleshy mesocarps. The nutritional value of a plant might vary depending on the phenological stage, species, plant portion, world region, and growing climatic conditions26.
Pj plant has been investigated for several applications, leaf extract to treat sore eyes, sore throat, diarrhoea, and open wounds27 as biopesticides28, gums for antioxidants29, extracts for antiplasmodial activity30, seed powder for the removal of Pb (II)31 and all parts of the plant for antibacterial activity32. Pj plants have higher carbon and less hydrogen content, leading to the best carbon-effective ratio for biorefinery. Pj pods were used as a raw material in a few fermentations to produce cellulolytic enzymes33, xylanase34, oxytetracycline35, ethanol36, bio-oil37 and biohydrogen38 and biochar production under pyrolysis39. To the best of our knowledge, the structural characterization of Pj pods was not yet reported.
The systemic characterization of biomass is essential for biofuel production40. The physicochemical properties of biomass help design the biomass conversion process, including feeding, conversion, sorting of intermediate products, and collection of products. Biomass physical, chemical and thermal properties are related to the gasification process, and the knowledge of biomass composition is also essential for solid waste management41. Therefore, the present study deals with the proximate, ultimate, biochemical and thermal properties of the Prosopis juliflora (Pj) pods to aid the selection of Pj pods as a feedstock for bioenergy and value-added products.
Pj pods (Common name: algarroba pods) were collected from Pudukkottai, Tamil Nadu, India, as per the ASTM International standards—ASTM E1757-1. The plant biomass was identified by botanist Dr Sam Aldrin, SASTRA Deemed University, India. The raw pods were collected from the same region for the entire study to prevent changes due to different nutritional content. The collected pods were washed completely with tap water and dried under sunlight. The dried pods were ground to achieve a 0.4–0.1 mm particle size using an ASTM sieve35.
Proximate analysis of Pj pod powder was conducted to estimate the moisture, volatile matter, ash content and fixed carbon40. Essential biofuel quality can be determined by proximate and ultimate analysis42.
The conventional oven-dry method (NREL) was used to estimate the moisture content according to ASTM E1756-01. Briefly, 10 g of Pj pods powder was weighed in the crucible and heated in a hot air oven at 105 °C for 4 h. Pj pods powder was removed from the crucible and allowed to cool in a desiccator. The moisture content of Pj pods was calculated using Eq. (1)40.
where a is crucible weight along with Pj pods powder; b is crucible weight; c is the weight of Pj pods powder as received after heating.
The volatile matter was determined according to ASTM standard E-872. Moisture-removed pods powder was taken into a covered crucible, ignified in a muffle furnace at 925 °C for 7 min and allowed to cool in a desiccator. The difference in weight loss was expressed as volatile matter and calculated using Eq. (2)40.
where a is the weight of Pj pods powder; b, the weight of Pj pods powder after heating; c, weight loss.
The leftover Pj pods powder from the estimated volatile matter was again ignified in a muffle furnace at 575 °C for 1 h, according to ASTM standard D1102. The difference in weight corresponds to the percentage of ash present in the Pj pods40.
Subsequently, the fixed carbon (FC) content was estimated as the difference in weight of moisture, volatile matter and ash content from the initial biomass. The fixed carbon content of Pj pods was calculated using Eq. (3)40.
The elemental composition of Pj pod powder, including carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, hydrogen and sulfur, was determined40.
CHNS analysis was carried out using CHNS Elemental analyser model Elemental Vario EL III Germany, analysed at CECRI Karaikkudi, India.
X-ray fluorescence spectrophotometry was used to estimate the mineral composition of the Pj pods. Briefly, the Pj pods powder was mixed with boric acid as a binder under high pressure (22 tons) to make a pellet. The pellet results were recorded in X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometer S8 Tiger, Bruker AXS, Germany, analysed at SASTRA Deemed University, Thanjavur, India, using a 4-kW rhodium anode X-ray tube43.
Pulping and bleaching are two crucial steps to extracting cellulose effectively from lignocellulosic biomass44. The acid bleach method was used to isolate and estimate the Pj pods’ cellulose. Briefly, 5 g of Pj pods powder was loaded in a Soxhlet apparatus with water and ethanol and reflexed for 8 h to eliminate the wax. The dewaxed Pj pods powder was bleached using 1.5% sodium chlorite for 2 h at 70 °C at pH 3.5. The bleaching procedure was repeated until a consistent white colour was obtained, indicating pure cellulose. The obtained cellulose was filtered, dried and weighed45.
The filtrate from the acid bleaching step was treated with 1 M NaOH at 65 °C for 2 h, neutralized with 6 M HCl at pH 5.5 and precipitated using ({raise0.7exhbox{$1$} !mathord{left/ {vphantom {1 3}}right.kern-nulldelimiterspace} !lower0.7exhbox{$3$}}) volume of ice-cold ethanol. The collected pellet was washed several times with distilled water to remove excess sodium hydroxide and centrifuged to obtain a hemicellulose pellet. The collected hemicellulose was dried in a hot air oven for 24 h and weighed45.
Acid hydrolysis was used for the isolation of lignin. Briefly, 1 g of Pj pod powder was hydrolyzed with 72% sulfuric acid, autoclaved for 2 h at 121 °C and filtered off. The filtrate was considered acid-soluble lignin, and the residue was acid-insoluble lignin. Further, the acid-soluble lignin was estimated using a UV–Visible spectrophotometer and Eqs. (4) & (5)46.
UV (abs), average absorbance for sample; ε, absorptivity (specific wavelength); ODW sample, sample weight in mg; path length, the path length of UV–Vis cell in cm.
Ethanol and benzene extract fat, wax, oil, gums, sugars and other pigmenting components from LCB. In a Soxhlet apparatus, 2.5 g of dried Pj pods powder was extracted with 150 mL of ethanol at 70 °C and reflexed for 8 h. The extracted Pj pods powder was dried in a hot air oven at 105 °C for 2 h. The weight difference between moisture-free pods and extractive complimentary pods powder is represented as extractives44.
The Kjeldahl method was adopted to estimate total nitrogen using a kelplus macro block digestion system (Model KES 12 L)47. Briefly, 0.5 g of Pj pods powder was mixed with 10 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid and 5 g of catalyst mixture (250 g of potassium Sulphate, 50 g of cupric Sulphate and 5 g of metallic selenium powder in 50:10:1). The mixture was taken in a digestion tube, loaded into the digester, and heated to 400 °C until the mixture turned light green, indicating the complete digestion process. The digested sample was distilled in a kelplus distylemba distillation system with a hose connected (Model classic dx). One side of the hose was connected with a conical flask and loaded with 20 mL of 4% boric acid and mixed indicator (0.066 g of methyl red and 0.099 g of bromocresol green dissolved in 95% of alcohol). The other side of the hose was loaded with 1 M NaOH and distilled. The digested sample was heated by passing the vapour constantly, and the released ammonia was absorbed into a conical flask. With the absorption of ammonia, the pinkish colour turned to green colour. The collected distillate was titrated against 0.02 N of sulfuric acid until the sample colour was changed from green to pink. Micro Kjeldahl total nitrogen was estimated from the titer values. Crude protein was calculated using Eq. (6) from the estimated nitrogen, assuming that nitrogen constitutes 16.5% of protein48.
The anthrone method was used to estimate the starch. Briefly, the 0.1 g Pj pods powder was mixed with 25 mL 80% of hot ethanol and 5 mL of distilled water. The mixture was stirred thoroughly, centrifuged, and decanted off. The residue was again centrifuged with 30 mL of 80% hot ethanol. Two extracts were combined under pressure in a boiling water bath. The alcoholic extract was mixed with 5 mL of distilled water and 6.5 mL of perchloric acid. The mixture was stirred for 30 min at room temperature and centrifuged. The pellet was suspended in 5 mL of distilled water; the perchloric acid extraction was repeated and centrifuged. Two extracts were combined, diluted to 100 mL and filtered.
Further, 5 mL of the filtrate was diluted to 100 mL with distilled water and used for starch analysis. The starch solution, 1 mL, was diluted with 1 mL of water, and 10 mL of anthrone reagent was added. The mixture was boiled in a boiling water bath for 12 min, cooled, and the amount of glucose was determined by a spectrophotometer. Starch was estimated from the glucose, assuming the 0.9 g starch yields 1 g glucose. Anthrone reagent was prepared as 10 mg of anthrone in 10 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid49.
The calorific value of Pj pods powder was determined with a Bomb calorimeter (Toshniwal, India). In a bomb, 0.46 g of moisture-free Pj pods powder was taken in a crucible, kept inside the bomb, and filled with 30 bar pressure of oxygen to combust the Pj pods powder.
TGA was performed in a Thermal analyzer50of model SDT Q-600 to identify the thermal stability of Pj pods, cellulose and hemicellulose. The thermal analysis was carried out under a nitrogen atmosphere of 0.5 lb/in2 with a 100 mL/min flow rate. The different stages of degradation were observed when the components started heating from 37 to 1000 °C.
The functional group of Pj pods, cellulose and hemicellulose were determined by Fourier Transform Infra-red Spectroscopy Spectrum one, Perkin Elmer USA40 at SASTRA Deemed University. The wavelength was measured in transmission mode from 400 to 4000 cm−1 by the ATR (Attenuated Total Reflectance) method51. Methanol was used to clean the ATR crystal before use. Later, the crystal was scooped with samples until they covered the surface area of the crystal and pressed with a mechanical anvil.
CP/MAS 13C spectrum of cellulose and hemicellulose was studied by Bruker Avance HD 500 MHz spectrophotometer from IITM, SAIF, CSAIF, Chennai, India44. The following condition was analyzed: resonance frequency at 125.76 MHZ; proton 90° pulse sequence was 4.30 µs; contact pulse 3300 µs, recycle delay was 5 s; acquisition time 0.02 s; 1024 scan per spectrum were used.
The SEM imaging of dried pods, acid-treated pods, cellulose and hemicellulose, was studied by Vega 2 TE-SCAN microscope with a speeding voltage of 10.0 kV. The magnification of the isolated cellulose was focused on up to 500X44.
The isolated cellulose crystallinity index was analysedusingPANalyticalXpert350 at Bishop Heber College, Trichy, India.
X-ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy analysis was conducted to estimate the chemical elements in the Pj pods powder. The mineral composition was studied by Bruker SPECTRA plus for S8 TIGER X-ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy43.
The proximate and ultimate analyses were used to determine the composition of Pj pods52. Table 1 shows the proximate analysis, including Pj pods’ volatile matter, ash content, moisture content and fixed carbon. Pj pods powder has less moisture content, 7.89 ± 0.002% w/w and could be a good source for energy conversion. In general, moisture in biomass reduces its heating value53 and decreases the yield of biomass combustion. Moisture content is represented as the quantity of water present per unit of Pj pods powder, and the low moisture content yields more combustion. High moisture content will decrease the yield of biomass combustion54. Pj pods showed a higher volatile matter content of 87.67 ± 0.002% w/w, which could be a valuable source for pyrolysis. The fuel reactivity has also been influenced by volatile matter55. The high volatile content of biomass has a propensity to easily burn and degrade during the thermochemical reaction, ideally yielding a higher proportion of bio-oil during the pyrolysis56.
Ash is composed of mineral and inorganic matter of biomass and affects the combustion rate of biomass40. The amount of total minerals in biomass indicates the ash content or total ash63. The higher and lower heating values, the amount of solid material to release, dust particles in combustion gases, boiler fouling, and corrosion are all strongly correlated with the ash content64. In addition, a high amount of ash content acts as a heat sink during pyrolysis or combustion that will reduce the fuel energy process65 and biomass with a greater ash content generates more char leftovers during pyrolysis56. Pj pods with a low ash content of 0.21 ± 0.002% w/w, comprising phosphorous, silica, aluminium, sodium, iron, calcium, and potassium, could be better feedstock for fuel energy production. However, ash is one example of a solid fraction that has the potential to be used in agriculture because of its high nitrogen, phosphorous, and potassium content2.
Fixed carbon (FC) is the amount of leftover Pj pods powder after releasing volatile matter, moisture, and ash40. The high amount of fixed carbon represents a high energy level. In most gasifiers, the conversion of FC into gases dictates the pace of gasification and its yield, making fixed carbon a significant parameter for gasification study66. Knowing fixed carbon’s shape and hardness can aid choose the right combustion equipment since they reveal a fuel’s caking qualities67. The high volatile matter will increase biochar yield in thermochemical conversion processes. Pj pods have a fixed carbon content of 4.23 ± 0.002% w/w, producing low char during combustion.
The elemental composition of Pj pods was determined by ultimate analysis (Table 2). The low values of nitrogen and sulfur in Pj pods assure a low rate of nitrogen oxide during biochar production68, low greenhouse emissions42 and thermochemical conversion processes such as pyrolysis, torrefaction and gasification2 and that can produce streams of liquid, solid, and gaseous products. Higher carbon content and a lower oxygen content must result in a higher heating value since the carbon content of biomass is directly correlated with the heating value, and the oxygen content is inversely correlated with the heating value69. The amount of carbon and oxygen are directly correlated with the heating value. Pj pods have a high amount of carbon, meaning that the more significant percentage of carbon, the higher the heating value of the fuel.
Additionally, a more significant oxygen content decreased the heating value of Pj pods, and biomass nitrogen content is crucial for evaluating nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions, an air pollutant64. One of the primary gases emitted during the thermal reactions of biomass is a nitrogen oxide (NOx). Therefore, these emissions need to be controlled as they affect human health. (NOx) consist of seven oxides that are considered the most emissions in an air70. When burning fuel, NOx emissions can be reduced in seven major methods by employing a catalytic combustion system, reduced air preheat, low NOx burner to lower the peak temperature, air staging and natural gas burning. Similarly, the ozone-depleting NO2 can also be treated in a similar way70.
As determined by XRF, the micronutrients Zn, Mn, P, Cu, Ca, Mg, Na, K, and Fe were present in the whole Pj pods (Table 3). The micro and macronutrients present in Pj pods are related to the properties of the soil where PJ pods trees have grown. Non-essential metal such as Lead (Pb) is present at high concentrations in Pj pods (Table 3). The presence of lead will be toxic to the human ecosystem as well as animals. The high number of lead will affect the animal’s food chain and cause soil erosion71.
Chemical analysis data for biomass is crucial information when examining the reaction properties of solid fuels. The term “holocellulose” refers to the total cellulose, which is made up of cellulose and hemicelluloses, and extractives constitute the significant portion of Pj pods powder, 88% with less protein, lignin and starch (Table 4). During pyrolysis, biomass with a higher extractive content yields more liquid products. Acid-soluble and acid-insoluble lignins were isolated and estimated through the acid hydrolysis method. Pj pods contain an almost negligible amount of lignin, 4.71 ± 0.12% w/w. Pj bark has been reported for a good amount of lignin,17.11%50. Lignin is the major obstacle to biomass conversion as it inhibits microorganisms’ growth72.
Sodium chlorite-based bleaching is an effective method to isolate cellulose from biomass. Alkaline treatment for the isolation of hemicellulose was a widely reported method, as it effectively cleaves the ester bond between lignin and hemicellulose44,45,72. Pj pods constitute 57.76 ± 0.14% w/w holocellulose less than the Pj bark, 77%50.
The amount of protein in Pj pods was estimated by the micro Kjeldahl method. Pj pods have shown a good amount of protein, 11.63 ± 0.12% w/w, an excellent alternative and low-cost animal feed. Further, the exact protein composition has to explore to assess the nutritional value, net protein utilization and digestibility. The protein content of Pj pods from Ecuador was reported as 10.1% (dry basis)47 and Pj seeds as 4.5%54.
With the high amount of hollocellulose and less lignin content of 4.71 ± 0.12% w/w, Pj pods could be an effective source for energy conversion through biochemical approaches. The negligible amount of starch 1.23 ± 0.06% w/w was determined, similar to starch obtained from waxy maize starch 1.2 ± 0.9%73, and the high amount of extractives needs further evaluation.
The calorific value is the heat released per unit of biomass during combustion. The HHV represents the gross calorific value and is influenced by elemental composition, moisture and ash content74. The higher HHV also indicates the Pj pods significance as a bioenergy source. The HHV value was calculated by using Eq. (7) obtained by the International Energy Agency (IEA), and the actual values can be seen in Eq. (8)69.
Here, the HHV of Pj pods was calculated using the elemental composition of Pj pods as 22.63 MJ/kg. The energy produced by Pj pods using a bomb calorimeter was 17.073 MJ/kg during combustion. The obtained HHV values from the bomb calorimeter could be compared with other biomass, such as corn cobs68 and 17.61 MJ/kg from olive tree pruning residue61.
To provide a prior assessment of the pyrolysis behaviour of the biomass being evaluated, thermo-gravimetric analysis TGA was carried out. The thermograms of Pj pods powder, cellulose and hemicellulose are shown in (Fig. 1). All the isolated polymers and Pj pods powder TGA (0–1000 °C) was recorded as weight loss (% w/w). The thermal cleavage of the carbohydrate monomer units causes cellulose and hemicellulose to volatilize when heated in an environment without oxygen in the presence of nitrogen.
TGA profile of (A) Pj pods, (B) cellulose (C) hemicellulose.
Pj pods TGA first stage was recorded at 88.99 °C (Fig. 1A) with 14.125% weight loss due to the evaporation of moisture and volatile compounds. The significant devolatilization of Pj pods occurred between 140 and 350 °C at this point, and a significant weight loss, 41.670%, was reduced and related to the degradation of α cellulose and lignin and hemicellulose75. This phenomenon is due to the breakdown of cellulose chains, and the dehydration, decarboxylation, and breakdown of glycosyl cellulose units could all be contributing factors75. The final stage of depolymerization of carbon residues was observed between 400 and 500 °C. Additionally, lignin degradation is seen in all the stages, and no further weight loss was recorded after that75. 71.83% of weight loss of Pj pods powder was recorded during TGA. A similar thermal degradation pattern was observed in Cassia fistula peel and Syzygium cumin seeds76, Eragrostisairoides, Imperata cylindrical feedstocks, and Coconut husk waste77.
In cellulose isolation, the reaction progresses in three stages17. The isolated cellulose degradation occurs at 150 °C with an initial weight loss of 9.65% (Fig. 1B). When the initial decomposition stage reaches 200–300 °C, the weight of cellulose begins to decline gradually. This steady decline is typically caused by dehydration in addition to the initial decomposition stage17. Most cellulose degradation occurs in the abrupt curve following the initial decomposition stage17. The significant cellulose weight loss, 52.85%, occurred between 200 to 380 °C due to depolymerization. But the crystalline structure of cellulose is thermally stable and degraded slowly till 380 °C17. Finally, carbon residues were depolymerized completely by 800 ℃. Overall, 85.04% of weight loss of Pj pods cellulose was determined during the tested conditions. The thermal degradation peaks of the isolated cellulose are similar to the literature on cellulose isolated from jackfruit peel44, diaper waste78, Calophyllum inum cake79, orange and lychee peel80.
The degradation of isolated hemicellulose started at 37 °C (Fig. 1C). Initial moisture and volatile matter evaporation were observed until 157 °C with a weight loss of 7.55%. The weight loss due to depolymerization of hemicellulose, 36.07%, occurred between 200 and 353 °C. Because the hemicellulose decomposes first between 220 and 315 °C due to more thermal liability. But the significant weight loss occurred between 400 and 600, with a total weight loss of 78.75%. A similar pattern of thermal degradation was reported for the hemicellulose isolated from corn stalk81, Neolomarckiacadamba82 and sugarcane83.
In contrast, lignin decomposes over a much more extensive temperature range of 190–900 °C and is a significantly more heterogeneous polymer when compared to cellulose or hemicelluloses). Therefore, lignin does not exhibit a straightforward weight loss derivate peak53. Furthermore, cellulose and hemicellulose share a significant amount of the thermal breakdown temperature interval with lignin84.
FTIR spectrum was recorded for Pj pods, cellulose, and hemicellulose to determine the functional groups and assigned bonds (Fig. 2A). In Pj pods, spectral peaks were observed at 3422 cm−1 corresponding to the axial angular bending of the O–H bond in hydroxyl groups in α cellulose, showing how the hydroxyl group is broadly distributed throughout the cellulose and hemicellulose structures85. Spectral peaks at 1635 cm−1 were assigned carbonyl stretching C–O for the acetyl group in hemicellulose and the aldehyde group in lignin. The C–O–C bond deformation of hemicellulose and cellulose was assigned to 1422 cm−1. The spectral peak at 1056 cm−1 can be assigned to the C–O–C group in Pj pods, and the overlap of stretching vibrations of glycosidic bonds in glucomannan and xylan85. A spectral peak of 606 cm−1 can be assigned to β glycosidic linkages within sugar units (Fig. 2A). A similar FTIR pattern was observed in Prosopis juliflora fibre50 and tea leaf brewing waste86.
FTIR pattern of (A) Pj pods (B) cellulose (C) hemicellulose.
The isolated cellulose FTIR spectrum (Fig. 2B) shows the major spectral peak at 3425 cm−1 indicating the fibre axial deformation of OH40. The spectral peak at 2927 cm−1 can be assigned to C–H symmetric and asymmetric tensile vibration87 and deformation of methyl and methylene. The absorption peak of 1603 cm−1 presence may be due to water absorption88. Peaks at 1408 cm−1 were due to CH2 bending vibration89. The IR peaks at 1106 cm−1 are attributed to the C–O asymmetric bridge stretching44. The spectral peaks at 617 cm−1 indicate -OH out of the plane bending band90. A similar pattern of FTIR peaks was observed in isolated cellulose from baby diaper waste78, jackfruit peel44, Phyllanthus emblica91, and orange and lychee biorefinery waste80.
The isolated hemicellulose FTIR spectrum (Fig. 2C) primarily has a strong band at 3416 cm-1 indicating O–H stretching and hydrogen bond. The spectral peak at 2299 cm−1 was attributed to the –CH bond deformation of CH2 groups. The spectral peak of 1642 cm-1 may be due to the absorption of water88. The absorption peak at 1113 cm−1 was due to ring vibration band C–OH bending87, and the stretching vibrations of the side groups COH and glycosidic bonds C–O–C overlapped with the sugar ring vibrations in this region85. The absorption peak of 788 cm−1 can be assigned to the C1 group frequency in the β -glycosidic linkages between sugar units87. The spectral peak of 1412 cm−1was due to –CH and –OH group bending87. Similar hemicellulose FTIR peaks were observed in hemicellulose from bamboo92, tea leaf brewing waste86 and sugarcane bagasse83.
Cross polarization/magic angle spinning solid-state NMR experiments were performed on CP/MS C13 solid-state NMR for the isolated cellulose (Fig. 3A) and hemicellulose (Fig. 3B). In the cellulose NMR spectrum, C1-C6 carbon peaks were observed in between 60 and 110 ppm which are overlaid on top of signals from less strong lignin and hemicellulose. C1 was assigned at 104.1 ppm, C4 was assigned at 87.90 ppm, 73.42, 72.15 and 71.70 ppm for C2, C3, C5 carbon, respectively. The peaks were divided into two peaks, the lower peak is crystalline, and the higher is the amorphous part of cellulose. C6 carbon was assigned at 61.92 ppm. The presence of crystalline cellulose peaked at 73.42, 72,5 and 71.70 ppm, respectively, and amorphous on the surface of fibres, which peaked at 87.90 and 61.92 ppm, is typically attributed to the splitting of the cellulose C-4 and C-6 resonance lines93. The above cellulose peaks are similar to those recorded in isolated cellulose from jackfruit peel44, cotton51, Calophylluminophyllum cake79, pomace91 and diaper waste78.
The C1-C6 carbon peaks of hemicellulose were recorded from 60 to 110 ppm (Fig. 3B). C1 was assigned at 116.91 ppm, C4 was assigned at 101.121 ppm, and 73.42, 73.421 ppm were assigned for C2, C3, C5 carbon, respectively. C6 carbon was assigned at 62.78 ppm. The observed peaks were similar to the hemicellulose of eucalyptus pulp94 and Kurrajong wood95.
Pj pods have irregular spherical fibres distributed individually between each other fibres (10 µm), with potentially smaller aspect ratios, giving a large surface area for chemical pretreatment (Fig. 4A). Due to the presence of binding substances like lignin, hemicelluloses, cellulose, the surface of the raw fibre appears uneven. The chemical pretreatments eliminate these binding components, which causes the fibres to come loose from the surface. Whereas the isolated cellulose depicted aggregated irregular bundles with branched tubular microfibril with a length of 20 µm was examined (Fig. 4B). The aggregated fibrils of microcrystalline cellulose composed of hundreds of individual cellulose whisker, which is made up of solid hydrogen bonds96. The NaClO2 bleaching aids in the removal of remaining lignin and promotes further disintegration, which results in the formation of cellulose microfibrils. The removal of non-cellulosic components is confirmed by the bleached pulp’s smoother and more uniform fibril surface97. The hydrolysis of nanocrystals is facilitated by the MCC’s roughness96. During hydrolysis, the amorphous cellulose structure has been removed so that the microfibril structure was formed98. Figure 4C shows the hemicellulose is arranged with the vascular bundle and fragmented fibre shape with a clear and rough crystalline surface. SEM images revealed the looped structures support the formulation of various composites.
SEM images of (A) Pj pods (B) cellulose (C) hemicellulose.
X-ray diffraction was performed to observe the crystalline forms of the isolated cellulose. The cellulose crystallinity will influence the hydrolysis rate of biomass and the source of raw materials. The higher crystallinity is resistant to less reactive and less accessible to hydrolysis. The degree of depolymerization decreases which increases the crystalline index (CrI). There were three typical peaks for Pj pods cellulose at 2θ angles of 2θ = 10º, 22.85º and 38.27º regions related to cellulose type I (crystallographic family of α –cellulose). There is a direct correlation between the degree of crystallinity and the hardness of the samples. The sample becomes more difficult as the crystallinity index rises75. Removing amorphous components causes the cellulose index to rise, resulting in the more significant intensity peak associated with bleached fibres99. In Pj pods, cellulose, a well-defined crystalline peak, was observed at 2θ = 10, 22.85 and 38.27 (Fig. 5). These peaks are related to the50. The Pj pods Crl was found to be 69.43%, which is much higher than the CrI value of sunflower stalk at 51.1% and rice hull 49.8%100, Typha angustata grass 65.16%101 and Phyllanthus Emblica 6091. The CrI of Pj pods was calculated using Eq. (9) 51.
where A crystalline = area under the crystalline portion of cellulose Aamorphous = area under the amorphous portion of the cellulose.
XRD pattern of Pj pods cellulose.
Prosopis juliflora (Pj) pods were characterised using FTIR, SEM, XRD, NMR, HHV and TGA. Lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose were isolated from Pj pods and evaluated. Pj pods have shown a low high carbon content of 41.77% w/w, a high calorific value of 17.073 MJ/kg, 57.76 ± 0.14% w/w of holocellulose and ash content of 0.21 ± 0.002% w/w. All the parameters were in good agreement with the reported literature. The composition and functional properties of holocellulose, and lignin may differ based on the structure and species of the biomass. However, only marginal differences can be observed in individual biomass based on seasonal and geographical variation. The significant amounts of holocellulose, 57.76 ± 0.14% w/w and the whole carbon content encourage high-value applications of Pj pods in biomass biorefinery. Minor proportions of lignin make it suitable for the fermentative production of biofuels. The present results indicated the significance of the valorization of Prosopis juliflora (Pj) pods. However, further in-depth investigations are required to efficiently utilize the same in environmental remediation, biomass-biorefinery and biofuel technologies. Recently our team has reported the hybrid hydrolysis and fermentation of Prosopis juliflora (Pj) pods for hydrogen production38. The scaleup of hydrogen production is in progress. Further, the combined thermochemical and biochemical routes for refining Prosopis juliflora (Pj) pods for bioenergy and other value-added products could contribute to the circular economy.
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Onokwai, A. et al. Characterization of lignocellulose biomass based on proximate, ultimate, structural composition, and thermal analysis. Mater. Today: Proc. 65, 2156 (2022).
CAS Google Scholar
Osman, A. I. et al. Physicochemical characterization and kinetic modeling concerning combustion of waste berry pomace. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 8, 17573–17586 (2020).
CAS Google Scholar
Osman, A. I. et al. Conversion of biomass to biofuels and life cycle assessment: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 19, 4075–4118 (2021).
CAS Google Scholar
Ala’a, H. et al. Circular economy approach of enhanced bifunctional catalytic system of CaO/CeO2 for biodiesel production from waste loquat seed oil with life cycle assessment study. Energy Convers. Manage. 236, 114040 (2021).
Google Scholar
Farrell, C. et al. Technical challenges and opportunities in realising a circular economy for waste photovoltaic modules. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 128, 109911 (2020).
CAS Google Scholar
Osman, A. I., Abdelkader, A., Farrell, C., Rooney, D. & Morgan, K. Reusing, recycling and up-cycling of biomass: A review of practical and kinetic modelling approaches. Fuel Process. Technol. 192, 179–202 (2019).
CAS Google Scholar
Haile, M., Hishe, H. & Gebremedhin, D. Prosopis juliflora pods mash for biofuel energy production: Implication for managing invasive species through utilization. Int. J. Renew. Energy Dev. 7, 205–212 (2018).
CAS Google Scholar
Rai, P. K., Singh, S., Asthana, R. & Singh, S. Biohydrogen production from sugarcane bagasse by integrating dark-and photo-fermentation. Biores. Technol. 152, 140–146 (2014).
CAS Google Scholar
Mardhiah, H. H., Ong, H. C., Masjuki, H., Lim, S. & Pang, Y. L. Investigation of carbon-based solid acid catalyst from Jatropha curcas biomass in biodiesel production. Energy Convers. Manage. 144, 10–17 (2017).
CAS Google Scholar
Antonopoulou, G., Vayenas, D. & Lyberatos, G. Ethanol and hydrogen production from sunflower straw: The effect of pretreatment on the whole slurry fermentation. Biochem. Eng. J. 116, 65–74 (2016).
CAS Google Scholar
Zhang, Z., Zhang, G., Li, W., Li, C. & Xu, G. Enhanced biogas production from sorghum stem by co-digestion with cow manure. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 41, 9153–9158 (2016).
CAS Google Scholar
Asadi, N. & Zilouei, H. Optimization of organosolv pretreatment of rice straw for enhanced biohydrogen production using Enterobacter aerogenes. Biores. Technol. 227, 335–344 (2017).
CAS Google Scholar
Argun, H. & Dao, S. Bio-hydrogen production from waste peach pulp by dark fermentation: Effect of inoculum addition. Int. J. Hydrog Energy 42, 2569–2574 (2017).
CAS Google Scholar
Lopez-Hidalgo, A. M., Sánchez, A. & De León-Rodríguez, A. Simultaneous production of bioethanol and biohydrogen by Escherichia coli WDHL using wheat straw hydrolysate as substrate. Fuel 188, 19–27 (2017).
CAS Google Scholar
Zhang, K., Ren, N.-Q. & Wang, A.-J. Fermentative hydrogen production from corn stover hydrolyzate by two typical seed sludges: Effect of temperature. Int. J. Hydrog Energy 40, 3838–3848 (2015).
CAS Google Scholar
Foong, S. Y. et al. Valorization of biomass waste to engineered activated biochar by microwave pyrolysis: Progress, challenges, and future directions. Chem. Eng. J. 389, 124401 (2020).
CAS Google Scholar
Osman, A. I. et al. Comprehensive thermokinetic modelling and predictions of cellulose decomposition in isothermal, non-isothermal, and stepwise heating modes. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 161, 105427 (2022).
CAS Google Scholar
Kuhad, R. C., Singh, A. & Eriksson, K.-E. L. Microorganisms and enzymes involved in the degradation of plant fiber cell walls. Biotechnology in the pulp and paper industry, 45–125 (1997).
Harish, B., Ramaiah, M. J. & Uppuluri, K. B. Bioengineering strategies on catalysis for the effective production of renewable and sustainable energy. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 51, 533–547 (2015).
CAS Google Scholar
Tadioto, V. et al. Analysis of glucose and xylose metabolism in new indigenous Meyerozyma caribbica strains isolated from corn residues. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 38, 1–14 (2022).
Google Scholar
Qambrani, N. A., Rahman, M. M., Won, S., Shim, S. & Ra, C. Biochar properties and eco-friendly applications for climate change mitigation, waste management, and wastewater treatment: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 79, 255–273 (2017).
CAS Google Scholar
Kumar, A., Singh, E., Mishra, R., Lo, S.-L. & Kumar, S. A green approach towards sorption of CO2 on waste derived biochar. Environ. Res. 214, 113954 (2022).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Osman, A. I. et al. Biochar for agronomy, animal farming, anaerobic digestion, composting, water treatment, soil remediation, construction, energy storage, and carbon sequestration: A review. Enviro. Chem. Lett. 20, 2385–2485 (2022).
Patnaik, P., Abbasi, T. & Abbasi, S. Prosopis (Prosopis juliflora): Blessing and bane. Trop. Ecol. 58, 455–483 (2017).
CAS Google Scholar
Shiferaw, H., Teketay, D., Nemomissa, S. & Assefa, F. Some biological characteristics that foster the invasion of Prosopis juliflora (Sw.) DC. at Middle Awash Rift Valley Area, north-eastern Ethiopia. J. Arid Environ. 58, 135–154 (2004).
ADS Google Scholar
Ruiz-Nieto, J. et al. Mesquite (Prosopis spp.) tree as a feed resource for animal growth. Agrofor. Syst. 94, 1139–1149 (2020).
Google Scholar
Vernon-Carter, E., Beristain, C. & Pedroza-Islas, R. in Developments in food science Vol. 41 217–238 (Elsevier, 2000).
Kishore, G. K. & Pande, S. Integrated management of late leaf spot and rust diseases of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) with Prosopis juliflora leaf extract and chlorothalonil. Int. J. Pest Manag. 51, 325–332 (2005).
Google Scholar
Sirmah, P., Mburu, F., Iaych, K., Dumarçay, S. & Gerardin, P. Potential antioxidant compounds from different parts of Prosopis juliflora. J. Trop. For. Sci. 23(2), 187–195 (2011).
Ravikumar, S., Inbaneson, S. J. & Suganthi, P. In vitro antiplasmodial activity of ethanolic extracts of South Indian medicinal plants against Plasmodium falciparum. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Dis. 2, 180–183 (2012).
CAS Google Scholar
Jayaram, K. & Prasad, M. Removal of Pb (II) from aqueous solution by seed powder of Prosopis juliflora DC. J. Hazard. Mater. 169, 991–997 (2009).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Singh, S., Swapnil, S. & Verma, S. Antibacterial properties of alkaloid rich fractions obtained from various parts of Prosopis juliflora. Int. J. Pharma. Sci. Res 2, 114–120 (2011).
Google Scholar
Jampala, P., Murugan, P., Ramanujam, S. & Uppuluri, K. B. Investigation on the effect of carbon and nitrogen sources for the production of cellulosome by Trichoderma reesei NCIM 1186 using saturated placket burman design. Biosci. Biotechnol. Res. Asia 12, 1577–1586 (2015).
Google Scholar
Murugan, P., Jampala, P., Ramanujam, S. & Uppuluri, K. B. Production of xylanase from a mixed culture system of Acetobacter xylinum and Cellulomonas uda in submerged fermentation. Biosci. Biotechnol. Res. Asia 12, 1615–1622 (2015).
Google Scholar
Ramasamy, S., Balakrishna, H. S., Selvaraj, U. & Uppuluri, K. B. Production and statistical optimization of oxytetracycline from Streptomyces rimosus NCIM 2213 using a new cellulosic substrate, Prosopis juliflora. BioResources 9, 7209–7221 (2014).
Google Scholar
Purohit, R., Patel, B. & Harsh, L. Potential of Prosopis pallida and Prosopis juliflora for Bioethanol production. Curr. Bot. 4, 18–20 (2013).
Google Scholar
Mythili, R., Subramanian, P. & Uma, D. Biofuel production from Prosopis juliflora in fluidized bed reactor. Energy Sour. Part A: Recov. Util. Environ. Eff. 39, 741–746 (2017).
CAS Google Scholar
Gayathri, G. & Uppuluri, K. B. Hybrid hydrolysis and fermentation optimization of Prosopis juliflora pods for the enhanced biohydrogen production by dark fermentation. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 1–17 (2022).
Karthikeyan, G., Karthikeyan, S., Suganya, K. & Kamaludeen Sara, P. B. Characterization of Biochar derived from wood biomass of Prosopis juliflora. Madras Agric. J. 106, 1 (2019).
Google Scholar
Singh, Y. D., Mahanta, P. & Bora, U. Comprehensive characterization of lignocellulosic biomass through proximate, ultimate and compositional analysis for bioenergy production. J. Renew. Energy 103, 490–500 (2017).
CAS Google Scholar
Matheri, A. N. et al. Quantitative characterization of carbonaceous and lignocellulosic biomass for anaerobic digestion. Renew. Sustain. Energy 92, 9–16 (2018).
CAS Google Scholar
Gözke, G. & Açıkalın, K. Pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of sour cherry stalk and flesh via thermogravimetric analysis using isoconversional methods. J. Therm. Anal. Calorimet. 146, 893–910 (2020).
de Gusmão, R. P., Cavalcanti-Mata, M. E. R. M., Duarte, M. E. M. & Gusmão, T. A. S. Particle size, morphological, rheological, physicochemical characterization and designation of minerals in mesquite flour (Proposis julifrora). J. Cereal Sci. 69, 119–124 (2016).
Google Scholar
Trilokesh, C. & Uppuluri, K. B. Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals from jackfruit peel. J. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–8 (2019).
CAS Google Scholar
Bano, S. & Negi, Y. S. Studies on cellulose nanocrystals isolated from groundnut shells. Carbohyd. Polym. 157, 1041–1049 (2017).
CAS Google Scholar
Sluiter, A. et al. Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass. J. Lab. Anal. Proc. 1617, 1–16 (2010).
Google Scholar
Marangoni, A. & Inteaz, A. Composition and properties of seeds and pods of the tree legume Prosopis juliflora (DC). J. Sci. Food Agric. 44, 99–110 (1988).
CAS Google Scholar
Mattila, P. et al. Nutritional value of commercial protein-rich plant products. J. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 73, 108–115 (2018).
CAS Google Scholar
Clegg, K. The application of the anthrone reagent to the estimation of starch in cereals. J. Sci. Food Agric. 7, 40–44 (1956).
CAS Google Scholar
Saravanakumar, S., Kumaravel, A., Nagarajan, T., Sudhakar, P. & Baskaran, R. Characterization of a novel natural cellulosic fiber from Prosopis juliflora bark. J. Carbohydr. Polym. 92, 1928–1933 (2013).
CAS Google Scholar
Ling, Z. et al. Effects of ball milling on the structure of cotton cellulose. J. Cellul. 26, 305–328 (2019).
CAS Google Scholar
Akor, C. I. et al. Thermokinetic study of residual solid digestate from anaerobic digestion. Chem. Eng. J. 406, 127039 (2021).
CAS Google Scholar
Demirbas, A. Relationships between heating value and lignin, moisture, ash and extractive contents of biomass fuels. Energy Explor. Exploit. 20, 105–111 (2002).
Google Scholar
López-Franco, Y., Cervantes-Montaño, C., Martínez-Robinson, K., Lizardi-Mendoza, J. & Robles-Ozuna, L. Physicochemical characterization and functional properties of galactomannans from mesquite seeds (Prosopis spp.). J. Food Hydrocoll. 30, 656–660 (2013).
Google Scholar
McKendry, P. Energy production from biomass (part 1): Overview of biomass. J. Bioresour. Technol. 83, 37–46 (2002).
CAS Google Scholar
Abdullah, A. et al. Bioenergy potential and thermochemical characterization of lignocellulosic biomass residues available in Pakistan. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 37, 1899–1906 (2020).
Google Scholar
Fawzy, S. et al. Kinetic modelling for pyrolytic conversion of dedicated short rotation woody crop with predictions for isothermal, non-isothermal and stepwise heating regimes. Appl. in Energy Combust. Sci. 9, 100048 (2022).
Google Scholar
Madhu, P., Pradeep, S., Sanjay, M. & Siengchin, S. in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 012016 (IOP Publishing).
Alves, J., Da Silva, J. & de Sena, R. in 26th European biomass conference and exhibition proceedings. Copenhagen. 769–777.
Chandrasekaran, A., Ramachandran, S. & Subbiah, S. Modeling, experimental validation and optimization of Prosopis juliflora fuelwood pyrolysis in fixed-bed tubular reactor. J. Bioresour. Technol. 264, 66–77 (2018).
CAS Google Scholar
Fawzy, S. et al. Kinetic modelling for pyrolytic degradation of olive tree pruning residues with predictions under various heating configurations. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 161, 221–230 (2022).
CAS Google Scholar
Kumar, R. & Chandrashekar, N. Production and characterization of briquettes from invasive forest weeds: Lantana camara and Prosopis juliflora. J. Indian Acad. Wood Sci. 17, 158–164 (2020).
Google Scholar
Liu, K. Effects of sample size, dry ashing temperature and duration on determination of ash content in algae and other biomass. Algal Res. 40, 101486 (2019).
Google Scholar
Librenti, E., Ceotto, E. & Di Candilo, M. In Third International Symposium of Energy from Biomass and Waste. (2010).
Mishra, R. K. & Mohanty, K. Characterization of non-edible lignocellulosic biomass in terms of their candidacy towards alternative renewable fuels. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 8, 799–812 (2018).
CAS Google Scholar
Prins, M. J., Ptasinski, K. J. & Janssen, F. J. More efficient biomass gasification via torrefaction. Energy 31, 3458–3470 (2006).
CAS Google Scholar
Sarkar, D. Chapter 3—Fuels and combustion. Thermal power plant; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 91–137 (2015).
Shariff, A., Mohamad Aziz, N. S., Ismail, N. I. & Abdullah, N. Corn cob as a potential feedstock for slow pyrolysis of biomass. J. Phys. Sci. 27, 123–137 (2016).
CAS Google Scholar
Sahoo, A., Kumar, S. & Mohanty, K. A comprehensive characterization of non-edible lignocellulosic biomass to elucidate their biofuel production potential. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 12, 5087–5103 (2020).
Osman, A. I. Mass spectrometry study of lignocellulosic biomass combustion and pyrolysis with NOx removal. Renew. Energy 146, 484–496 (2020).
CAS Google Scholar
Maldonado-Magaña, A. et al. Establishment of cell suspension cultures of Prosopis laevigata (Humb. & Bonpl. ex Willd) MC Johnst to determine the effect of zinc on the uptake and accumulation of lead. J. Revis. Mex. de Ing. Quím. 12, 489–498 (2013).
Google Scholar
Zhang, K., Ren, N.-Q. & Wang, A.-J. Fermentative hydrogen production from corn stover hydrolyzate by two typical seed sludges: Effect of temperature. J. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 40, 3838–3848 (2015).
CAS Google Scholar
Kaufman, R., Wilson, J., Bean, S., Herald, T. & Shi, Y.-C. Development of a 96-well plate iodine binding assay for amylose content determination. J. Carbohydr. Polym. 115, 444–447 (2015).
CAS Google Scholar
Kumar, R., Pandey, K., Chandrashekar, N. & Mohan, S. Study of age and height wise variability on calorific value and other fuel properties of Eucalyptus hybrid, Acacia auriculaeformis and Casuarina equisetifolia. J. Biomass Bioenergy 35, 1339–1344 (2011).
CAS Google Scholar
Hemmati, F., Jafari, S. M., Kashaninejad, M. & Motlagh, M. B. Synthesis and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals derived from walnut shell agricultural residues. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 120, 1216–1224 (2018).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pal, D. B., Tiwari, A. K., Srivastava, N., Hashem, A. & Abd Allah, E. F. Thermal studies of biomass obtained from the seeds of Syzygium cumini and Cassia fistula L. and peel of Cassia fistula L. fruit. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 1–12 (2021).
Pawar, A., Panwar, N., Jain, S., Jain, N. & Gupta, T. Thermal degradation of coconut husk waste biomass under non-isothermal condition. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 1–10 (2021).
Trilokesh, C., Bavadharani, P., Mahapriyadarshini, M., Janani, R. & Uppuluri, K. B. Recycling baby diaper waste into cellulose and nanocellulose. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 12(8), 4299–4306 (2020).
Malolan, V. V., Trilokesh, C., Uppuluri, K. B. & Arumugam, A. Ionic liquid assisted the extraction of cellulose from de-oiled Calophyllum inophyllum cake and its characterization. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 1–7 (2020).
Thulasisingh, A., Kannaiyan, S. & Pichandi, K. C ellulose nanocrystals from orange and lychee biorefinery wastes and its implementation as tetracycline drug transporter. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 1–14 (2021).
Lv, G.-J., Wu, S.-B. & Lou, R. Kinetic study for the thermal decomposition of hemicellulose isolated from corn stalk. BioResources 5, 1281–1291 (2010).
CAS Google Scholar
Zhao, X. et al. Characterization of hemicelluloses from Neolamarckia cadamba (Rubiaceae) during xylogenesis. Carbohyd. Polym. 156, 333–339 (2017).
CAS Google Scholar
da Silva Braga, R. & Poletto, M. Preparation and characterization of hemicellulose films from sugarcane bagasse. Materials 13, 941 (2020).
ADS PubMed Central Google Scholar
Maddi, B., Viamajala, S. & Varanasi, S. Comparative study of pyrolysis of algal biomass from natural lake blooms with lignocellulosic biomass. Biores. Technol. 102, 11018–11026 (2011).
CAS Google Scholar
Wang, S. et al. Structural characterization and pyrolysis behavior of cellulose and hemicellulose isolated from softwood Pinus armandii Franch. Energy Fuels 30, 5721–5728 (2016).
CAS Google Scholar
Taşar, Ş. Thermal conversion behavior of cellulose and hemicellulose fractions isolated from tea leaf brewing waste: Kinetic and thermodynamic evaluation. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 12, 2935–2947 (2021).
Azubuike, C. P. & Okhamafe, A. O. Physicochemical, spectroscopic and thermal properties of microcrystalline cellulose derived from corn cobs. Int. J. Recycl. Organ. Waste Agric. 1, 1–7 (2012).
Google Scholar
Rosa, S. M., Rehman, N., de Miranda, M. I. G., Nachtigall, S. M. & Bica, C. I. Chlorine-free extraction of cellulose from rice husk and whisker isolation. J. Carbohydr. Polym. 87, 1131–1138 (2012).
CAS Google Scholar
He, Q. et al. Highly crystalline cellulose from brown seaweed Saccharina japonica: Isolation, characterization and microcrystallization. J. Cellul. 25, 5523–5533 (2018).
CAS Google Scholar
Toğrul, H. & Arslan, N. Flow properties of sugar beet pulp cellulose and intrinsic viscosity–molecular weight relationship. J. Carbohydr. Polym. 54, 63–71 (2003).
Google Scholar
Gupta, V., Ramakanth, D., Verma, C., Maji, P. K. & Gaikwad, K. K. Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals from amla (Phyllanthus emblica) pomace. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 1–12 (2021).
Yuan, Z., Kapu, N. S. & Martinez, D. M. An eco-friendly scheme to eliminate silica problems during bamboo biomass fractionation. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 32, 4–13 (2017).
CAS Google Scholar
Calucci, L., Rasse, D. P. & Forte, C. Solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance characterization of chars obtained from hydrothermal carbonization of corncob and miscanthus. Energy Fuels 27, 303–309 (2013).
CAS Google Scholar
Wan, J., Wang, Y. & Xiao, Q. Effects of hemicellulose removal on cellulose fiber structure and recycling characteristics of eucalyptus pulp. J. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 4577–4583 (2010).
CAS Google Scholar
Barron, P., Frost, R., Doimo, L. & Kennedy, M. 13-CP/MAS NMR examination of some Australian woods and their chemical and biochemical degradation residues. J. Macromol. Sci. Chem. 22, 303–322 (1985).
Google Scholar
Haafiz, M. M., Hassan, A., Zakaria, Z. & Inuwa, I. Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanowhiskers from oil palm biomass microcrystalline cellulose. Carbohyd. Polym. 103, 119–125 (2014).
CAS Google Scholar
Chandra, J., George, N. & Narayanankutty, S. K. Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibrils from arecanut husk fibre. Carbohyd. Polym. 142, 158–166 (2016).
Google Scholar
Zhao, H. et al. Studying cellulose fiber structure by SEM, XRD, NMR and acid hydrolysis. J. Carbohydr. Polym. 68, 235–241 (2007).
CAS Google Scholar
Pereira, P. et al. Sugarcane bagasse cellulose fibres and their hydrous niobium phosphate composites: Synthesis and characterization by XPS, XRD and SEM. Cellulose 21, 641–652 (2014).
CAS Google Scholar
Haykiri‑Acma, H. & Yaman, S. Treating lignocellulosic biomass with dilute solutions at ambient temperature: Effects on cellulose crystallinity. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. (2022).
Manimaran, P. et al. Extraction and characterization of natural lignocellulosic fibres from Typha angustata grass. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. (2022).
Download references
GG thanks SASTRA Deemed University, Thanjavur, India, for the Teaching Assistantship.
Bioprospecting Laboratory, Centre for Bioenergy, School of Chemical and Biotechnology, SASTRA Deemed University, Thanjavur, 613 401, India
G. Gayathri & Kiran Babu Uppuluri
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
K.B.U. conceived the idea and designed the experiments. G.G. conducted all the experiments. K.B.U. & G.G. analyzed the data, wrote and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Correspondence to Kiran Babu Uppuluri.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Reprints and Permissions
Gayathri, G., Uppuluri, K.B. The comprehensive characterization of Prosopis juliflora pods as a potential bioenergy feedstock. Sci Rep 12, 18586 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22482-9
Download citation
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22482-9
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
Advertisement
© 2022 Springer Nature Limited
Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.