SpaceX’s Starlink Internet Service May Be a Gamechanger In Africa
Bola Ahmed Tinubu, Nigeria’s Kingmaker, Is Now Its President-Elect
Making South Sudan’s Oil and Water Resources Work for Its People
Wagner Group: Russia’s Mercenary Army in Africa
China-Built Addis Ababa Light Rail Struggles Come to a Head
Here’s Where Gas is the Most Expensive in the U.S.
How Donald Trump’s Indictment Stretches the U.S. Legal System
Study: Mass Shootings Dropped During Assault Weapons Ban
How Brazil’s Lula Will Balance China and the U.S.
Why Donald Trump Can Still Run for President After Being Indicted
South Korea Debates Going Nuclear
China’s Growth Threatened By Rural Underdevelopment
China’s Proactive Diplomacy Bolsters Its Economic and Maritime Power
China’s Shrinking Population No Imminent Threat Economy
Vietnam Hedges Its Bets on the Belt and Road Initiative
Why Finland Joining NATO Is a Major Blow to Putin
Humza Yousaf: Scotland’s Muslim Leader in Changing British Politics
How Xi and Putin View Peace in Ukraine and a Post-Conflict World
Weak Western Reaction to Crimea Referendum Paved Way for Wider Invasion
Why Moldova Could Be Next in Russia’s Plans for Horizontal Escalation
Russian Navy Ship Makes Rare Saudi Arabia Port Call
How Saudi Arabia’s Billion-Dollar LIV Golf Is Shaking Up the Sport
Saudi Arabia Takes First Step Toward Joining China, Russia-Led Group
Iran-Saudi Arabia Deal Heralds China’s Rise as Middle East Power
U.S. Intelligence Identifies Where China May Build Next Overseas Bases
The Propaganda Fueling Russia’s ‘Forever War’ With Ukraine
Russia and Ukraine Gear Up for Crimea Spring Offensive
Russia Says It Will Deploy Tactical Nuclear Weapons in Belarus
Russia’s Failure to Dominate the Sea Has Changed the Course of the Ukraine War
Why Russia’s Suspension of New START Nuclear Agreement Matters
Why Is Pakistan Arming Ukraine?
Is India’s Rise Actually Good for the West?
Survey: Ex-PM Imran Khan Is Pakistan’s Most Popular Politician
Here’s Why India is Attacking George Soros
Himalayan Water Wars: India Raises Heat on Pakistan on Indus Waters Treaty
China-Europe Space Collaboration Fails to Launch
Distant Star TOI-700 Has Two Potentially Habitable Planets Orbiting It
China Ready to Go It Alone in Space
SpaceX: Crew Dragon is Returning to Earth – Here’s When to Hold Your Breath
The UAE’s Mars Mission Seeks to Bring Hope to More Places Than the Red Planet
What Binance’s U.S. Lawsuit Means for the Future of Crypto Regulation
Xi-Putin Meeting Marks Return of China-Russia Axis and Start of New Cold War
The Peril and Promise of ChatGPT and AI Information Retrieval
AUKUS Submarine Deal Will Be Australia’s Biggest Defense Project Ever
Sanctions Rarely Work, But Are They Still the Least Bad Option?
World
World
World
World
World
World
World
World
World
World
Binance is not only up against two powerful U.S. financial regulators, the CTFC and the SEC, but it could also face heat from Congress.
By
on
The world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, Binance, has been hit with a lawsuit by the U.S. regulator the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). This is not the first time a cryptocurrency exchange has been charged by a regulator. But this particular case involves a regulator that does not directly oversee cryptocurrencies. This indicates how regulators — particularly those in the U.S. — hope to clamp down on the cryptocurrency industry.
The CFTC’s lawsuit alleges that Binance violated U.S. derivatives laws by offering its derivative trading services to U.S. customers without registering with the right market regulators. It says Binance has prioritized commercial success over regulatory compliance.
The CFTC has also levied charges against Binance’s founder and CEO, Changpeng Zhao (known as CZ), and former chief compliance officer Samuel Lim. They are charged with taking steps to violate U.S. laws, including directing U.S.-based “VIP customers” to open Binance accounts under the name of shell companies. The regulator has pointed to chat messages as evidence of CZ and Sim’s knowledge of various criminal groups using the exchange.
People visit Binance nearly 15 million times a week to trade on the over 300 cryptocurrencies it offers in more than 1,600 different markets. CZ is an outspoken advocate for cryptocurrencies and regularly tweets about the industry and his company. He even tweeted a link to his initial response to the recent CFTC charges, which he called “unexpected and disappointing.” Promising full responses in due time, he said:
“Upon an initial review, the complaint appears to contain an incomplete recitation of facts, and we do not agree with the characterization of many of the issues alleged in the complaint.”
Last year CZ’s tweets arguably contributed to the collapse of FTX, one of his company’s main rivals. Binance saw its market share grow following FTX’s collapse.
So, this charge — against not only a crypto giant but also the company of an outspoken industry advocate — has created further upheaval in a market that has already suffered multiple crises in the last year. Investors withdrew a reported $1.6 billion from Binance within days of the CFTC’s announcement of its charges. These outflows could continue if U.S. regulators tighten their squeeze on crypto companies further, causing major players like Binance to shift focus to other jurisdictions.
The CFTC aims to “protect the public from fraud, manipulation, and abusive practices related to the sale of commodity and financial futures and options, and to foster open, competitive, and financially sound futures and option markets.” Previous actions by this regulator in 2021 against Tether and Bitfinex resulted in major fines and a loss of credibility for the crypto industry.
But a statement published at the time by one of the CFTC’s five commissioners, Dawn Stump, pointed out that the CFTC doesn’t actually have responsibility for regulating cryptocurrencies. She warned that these fines might “cause confusion about the CFTC’s role in this area.” She said the action was based on defining stablecoins (a type of cryptocurrency) as a commodity, but: “we should seek to ensure the public understands that we do not regulate stablecoins and we do not have daily insight into the businesses of those who issue such.”
These latest charges against Binance focus on its activities in derivatives — financial contracts that are linked to the value of an asset such as oil or, in this case, cryptocurrencies. This is a market the CFTC does regulate.
Another U.S. financial regulator, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), has also been ramping up its crypto oversight activities. As well as focusing on the Initial Coin Offering market, it saw a 50 percent increase in enforcement actions against digital asset companies last year compared to 2021.
So, Binance is up against two powerful U.S. financial regulators. Some experts have warned that “significant regulatory action could prompt Binance to increasingly shift its business operations beyond the United States.” Certainly, the fact that Binance held a 92 percent share of the crypto market at the end of 2022 means it facilitates many transactions and offers a lot of liquidity to traders around the world, including in the U.S.
A trader’s capacity to find competitive prices when buying and selling, as well as sources of liquidity (or other people to trade with), would be affected by the loss of or pull back of one of the world’s top ten crypto exchanges. This would be bad news for retail and institutional investors who could be confronted with a smaller and potentially more expensive market as a result.
And even if the complaints and investigations by the CFTC and SEC take a while to conclude, as is likely, the U.S. legislature may step in before that. A report published by the Financial Times days after the CFTC announcement alleges that Binance has hidden links to China for many years. A statement issued by the exchange to the FT said this is not “an accurate picture of Binance’s operations” and that the paper’s sources were “citing ancient history (in crypto terms).”
But recent actions against Chinese tech company Huawei and social media platform TikTok indicate political leaders are keen to crack down on Chinese companies’ access to U.S. technology systems and customer data. So any similar concerns could lead U.S. politicians to start acting in this area as well.
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Here’s Where Gas is the Most Expensive in the U.S.
China’s Growth Threatened By Rural Underdevelopment
How Donald Trump’s Indictment Stretches the U.S. Legal System
Study: Mass Shootings Dropped During Assault Weapons Ban
By clicking submit, you agree to share your email address with Globely News and Mailchimp to receive marketing, updates, and other emails from Globely News.
© 2023 Globely News. All Rights Reserved.