Link copied.
We want to bridge divides to reach everyone.
Already a subscriber? Log in to hide ads.
A selection of the most viewed stories this week on the Monitor’s website.
Every Saturday
Hear about special editorial projects, new product information, and upcoming events.
Occasional
Select stories from the Monitor that empower and uplift.
Every Weekday
An update on major political events, candidates, and parties twice a week.
Twice a Week
Stay informed about the latest scientific discoveries & breakthroughs.
Every Tuesday
A weekly digest of Monitor views and insightful commentary on major events.
Every Thursday
Latest book reviews, author interviews, and reading trends.
Every Friday
A weekly update on music, movies, cultural trends, and education solutions.
Every Thursday
The three most recent Christian Science articles with a spiritual perspective.
Every Monday
Loading…
| Pari Island, Indonesia
Several of Indonesia’s islands have already been engulfed by rising sea levels, and experts say around 115 could be submerged by 2050, including Pari Island, a popular vacation spot some 27 miles north of Jakarta. But its 1,400 residents aren’t going down without a fight.
Four are suing Swiss concrete giant Holcim, demanding the company dramatically reduce its emissions and pay the plaintiffs for climate-related damages. The case – the first in Indonesia to pit members of the public against a foreign private company through transnational litigation – is headed to civil court in Switzerland after conciliation ended this month with Holcim rejecting the demands.
Small island communities on the front lines of climate change are testing a novel tactic: challenging the multinational corporations that rank among the world’s top polluters. A first-of-its-kind lawsuit seeks to rebalance the scales.
The lawsuit follows a global trend (one report found that climate change lawsuits have more than doubled since 2015), and also showcases a growing public awareness on climate change and desire for justice, says Agung Wardana, Humboldt Fellow at Max Planck Institute for International Law in Heidelberg, Germany.
“This will be a landmark case in Indonesia,” says Mr. Wardana. “I think many others could follow suit in demanding accountability of major polluters. The homework to win the case is to find the causality between Holcim’s activities and its impact on Pari Island. That’s the challenge.”
Last December, Arif Pujiyanto was resting at his home on Bintang Beach, Pari Island – a popular vacation spot some 27 miles north of Jakarta – after a day’s work when he heard a neighbor shouting.
“Seawater is coming in!” they repeated.
Mr. Pujiyanto grabbed his sandals and ran out of his house only to find ankle-deep tidal flooding had already inundated his neighborhood. Within a few hours, the seawater reached his knees, flooded his kitchen, and engulfed most of the island, before receding in the early morning.
Small island communities on the front lines of climate change are testing a novel tactic: challenging the multinational corporations that rank among the world’s top polluters. A first-of-its-kind lawsuit seeks to rebalance the scales.
“In my youth, rising tide was the most cherished moment,” says Mr. Pujiyanto, who now works as a welder but used to spend his days hopping between fishing boats, catching groupers, squids, and shrimp. “It’s the perfect moment to catch fish. But now the high tide moves in against us.”
Environmental groups say Pari Island has lost around 5 acres of land due to sea-level rise in recent decades, and most of the island could be submerged by 2050. But residents aren’t going down without a fight.
Four residents are suing Swiss concrete giant Holcim, demanding the company dramatically reduce its emissions and pay the plaintiffs a modest fee for climate-related damages. The case – the first in Indonesia to pit members of the public against a foreign private company through transnational litigation – is now headed to court in Switzerland, where it could take months to resolve. It follows a global trend; a report by the London School of Economics Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment found that climate change lawsuits have more than doubled since 2015.
It also showcases an increase in public awareness on climate change and a desire for justice, says Agung Wardana, an environmental law expert and a Humboldt Fellow at Max Planck Institute for International Law in Heidelberg, Germany.
“This will be a landmark case in Indonesia,” says Mr. Wardana. “I think many others could follow suit in demanding accountability of major polluters. The homework to win the case is to find the causality between Holcim’s activities and its impact on Pari Island. That’s the challenge.”
Experts say Indonesia, the largest archipelago in the world with more than 17,000 islands, will be among the hardest hit by climate change. Several islands have already been lost, and Indonesia’s Research and Innovation Agency states that around 115 will be submerged by 2050.
In recent decades, all major drivers of Pari Island’s economy have been threatened by climate change, including fishing and seaweed farming, the latter of which was a cornerstone of the island’s economy until the early 2000s.
Asmania, who goes by one name and is a plaintiff in the Holcim case, remembers how “dried seaweeds were lined along the road” during the ’90s, before warming sea temperatures and pollution took its toll on the crop. “They’re long gone and we can’t grow them back,” she says.
In the years since, tourism has largely filled the gap. An average of 2,000 tourists visit the tiny island each month, and the numbers increase considerably during holiday seasons, reaching more than 10,000 during Eid.
Weekends are the busiest time for fisherman Edi Mulyono. He and his wife provide tour packages around the island, as well as rent out guesthouses, snorkeling gear, and boats.
“It’s been a good business,” says Mr. Mulyono. “We manage all tourism attractions on Pari Island by ourselves without the help from the government, but local tourism is threatened as some guests canceled their trip when seawater breached.”
Mr. Mulyono observed that tidal floods have become higher since 2019, reaching over two feet in some areas, and increasingly difficult to predict. Changing weather patterns also made it harder to catch fish, forcing fishers to sail out more than 15 miles to get a good catch.
“Our ancestors know the seasons and the best time to catch fish just judging by the direction of the wind,” Mr. Mulyono says. “But now it becomes unpredictable. It’s not uncommon for us to come home empty-handed.”
Even though life was challenging for Pari Island’s 1,400 residents, many didn’t realize the extent of the problem until a community meeting with the Indonesian Forum for Environment (WALHI) in 2021. During the discussion researchers and activists from the nongovernmental organization presented data on rising sea levels and explained how carbon emissions from massive, multinational companies threatened the future of their island.
Armed with that information and the support of their neighbors, four residents partnered with WALHI, the European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights, and Swiss Church Aid in July of this year to take legal action, honing in on cement giant Holcim.
Holcim is among 100 top polluters in the world, known as Carbon Majors, alongside oil and gas giants such as Shell, BP, Anadarko, and others. With presence in over 90 countries, Holcim has emitted more than 7.1 billion tons of carbon between 1950 to 2021, according to research by the Climate Accountability Institute.
The company has been active in Indonesia since 2001, when it acquired national cement producer Semen Cibinong.
“Why Holcim? people asked,” says Puspa Dewy, head of WALHI’s research and legal division. “It is because the cement industry was the third major polluter after oil and gas. Holcim today is the largest cement producer in the world, and we demand their responsibility to further cut their emission.”
Experts argue there’s precedent for such demands.
Mr. Wardana says the Pari case bears resemblance to a 2015 lawsuit that Peruvian farmer Saúl Luciano Lliuya filed against German energy company RWE, as well as Milieudefensie et al v. Royal Dutch Shell. In May 2021, a district court in The Hague, Netherlands, ordered Royal Dutch Shell to reduce its global carbon emissions by 45% by 2030, becoming the first major climate litigation ruling against a corporation.
The plaintiffs demand Holcim cut its greenhouse gas emissions by 43% by 2030 and 69% by 2040. They also demand approximately $3,300 for each plaintiff in compensation for psychological and material losses.
Holcim has said it “takes climate change very seriously,” and “we significantly reduced our footprint over the last decade and will cut it further by 2030.” The mandatory conciliation period ended this month with Holcim rejecting the lawsuit’s demands. Having failed to reach an agreement, the next step is civil court, according to Parid Ridwanuddin, a coastal campaigner with WALHI.
Mr. Mulyono hopes that a court victory will pressure other major polluters, not just Holcim, to cut their global emissions. He says he and his neighbors want to live without fear of losing their island.
Local environmental activists also hope that raising the profile of Pari Island’s plight will remind Jakarta of the urgency of climate change. Its proximity to the capital “should be a warning to the government that the impact of climate change is right in front of the door,” says Mr. Ridwanuddin.
In the meantime, many Pari residents are doing their part to mitigate the effects of climate change.
Asmania and many other residents set up a local mangrove-planting initiative in the hopes of preventing seawater intrusion. They have planted thousands of mangroves on three beaches over the past two years, and plan to add more by collecting seeds from existing trees.
Get stories that
empower and uplift daily.
Already a subscriber? Log in to hide ads.
“We also offer tourists to donate some money in exchange for planting mangroves together,” she says. “I think this is a good way to raise awareness among tourists that we have to protect this island.”
This story was supported by the Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting.
Already a subscriber? Login
Monitor journalism changes lives because we open that too-small box that most people think they live in. We believe news can and should expand a sense of identity and possibility beyond narrow conventional expectations.
Our work isn’t possible without your support.
Already a subscriber? Login
Link copied.
We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.
Dear Reader,
About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:
“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”
If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.
But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.
The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.
We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”
If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.
Subscribe to insightful journalism
Already a subscriber? Log in to hide ads.
A selection of the most viewed stories this week on the Monitor’s website.
Every Saturday
Hear about special editorial projects, new product information, and upcoming events.
Occasional
Select stories from the Monitor that empower and uplift.
Every Weekday
An update on major political events, candidates, and parties twice a week.
Twice a Week
Stay informed about the latest scientific discoveries & breakthroughs.
Every Tuesday
A weekly digest of Monitor views and insightful commentary on major events.
Every Thursday
Latest book reviews, author interviews, and reading trends.
Every Friday
A weekly update on music, movies, cultural trends, and education solutions.
Every Thursday
The three most recent Christian Science articles with a spiritual perspective.
Every Monday
Follow us:
Your subscription to The Christian Science Monitor has expired. You can renew your subscription or continue to use the site without a subscription.
Return to the free version of the site
If you have questions about your account, please contact customer service or call us at 1-617-450-2300.
This message will appear once per week unless you renew or log out.
Your session to The Christian Science Monitor has expired. We logged you out.
Return to the free version of the site
If you have questions about your account, please contact customer service or call us at 1-617-450-2300.
You don’t have a Christian Science Monitor subscription yet.
Return to the free version of the site
If you have questions about your account, please contact customer service or call us at 1-617-450-2300.